Laserfiche WebLink
K'f?,y ,2c!':r.,e:ider r' :' :.' .:'. ?, w!',o v.'~_~].~, be responsib].e for <br />1'.3'pc of' ~cr~:~.ning is a(~']u::t~'~. A~ it. was ~e+~tr:.:i~ed ~hat it would be <br />tho r~.~po~zib~]it.y of eit!~er Clayton Berg or Mr. Schne!le, ~on West <br />s~,~tod t]ip~ so~o kind of gui' :' <br /> c~e~lne be discussed.. It was ascertained that <br />fe~cin?~ would be most f~ssi]~!e. <br /> <br />Ken Peterson questioned the nerd of a Ccuple o f:' cars ;-presently on the <br />property. Mr. Kerssen explained that two of them belonged to his brother <br />for uso _~n dezo-derbies and would be removed soon~ and that the car and <br />truck in the field would be junked. Ken Peterson asked about what type, <br />of noise would be generoted from this type of business. Mr. Kerssen ex- <br />plained thet the noise of the ginder was less than the noise of someone <br />mowing their !av.m~ and that his neighbors h~ve never commented on any noise, <br />A1 $orteberg stated thr. t he was interested in restrictions which would call <br />for a~equate screening ~nd a limited number of vehicles.along road. <br /> <br />Motion by Ron West, seconded by Art Dunn to recommend to the City Council <br />to grant a conditional use permit to Phillip Kerssen.to allow him to sell <br />and manufactur~ trailers in his garage along with selling any items taken <br />in trade.on his property located at 1~765 Nowthen Blvd., subject to the <br />fol ]_o ~',ing don~itions: <br /> 1.) A maximum of three items of any combination (trailer or trade-in) <br /> be on display with all other items adequately screened.. <br /> <br /> 2.) All raw materials be stored out of sight from road and adjacent <br /> property' owners. <br /> <br /> That the two demo-derby cars~ and the car and truck in fiSld be <br /> removed. <br />Motion carried 5-1. Kathy Schneider opposed. <br /> <br />Item 2. Variance reouest - Alex Werz. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Alex Werz were present to explain that they Purchased a <br />1 acre ]_o_t from J.D. Scott at 16960 Bison Street N.W. in August 1972. <br />Now they have an interested buyer and because of the ordinance requiring <br />that the 10t having to be recorded prior to April 27,.1972, they are <br />paying taxes on a lot they c~n not obtain a building permit for. <br /> <br />Mr. Werz explained that Mr. Landol Locher was the attorney at the time~ <br />and believes that they had paid half his fee on the transaction and <br />was never told that the lot was not buildab!e. <br /> <br />Gerry Zimmerman stated that Mr. Werz should have had his ovm attorney, <br />and would like an opinion fro~ the City attorney in regards to ~the. <br />present situation. . <br /> <br />A1 Sorteberg stated that he realized this was riOt"the Werz's fault, but <br />agrees them ~hould have had own attorney and then this would have sho%,m <br />up in a title searbh, ~nd that he was in favor of granting a variance. <br /> <br />Mr. Werz stated that he felt the City should grant a variance so that <br />a house could be built in order to increase the taxes on the prope~y. <br /> <br />Kathy Schneider exvlained that she was concerned v~th how many others <br />would be coming in on Bison Street with the same ~roblem~ and the exact <br />location of the lot should be determined for easement purposes.' She <br />stated that she was not opposed to granting the variance, but wished to <br /> <br /> <br />