Laserfiche WebLink
Engineer Raatikka stated that it appears that their drainage is flowing <br />onto another property. <br /> <br />P & Z Commissioners recommendation is that they will have to solve the <br />drainage problem, combine lots or something smd maintain the drainage on <br />their own property; provide place for employee parking, marking the area; <br />provide place for parking heavy equipment, and obtain a variance on the <br />access road. <br /> <br />It was noted that Marv Realty owns the road they are using at present. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairman Peterson, seconded by Zimmerman to recommend to the <br />City Council that before a building permit is issued to Minnesota <br />Utilities for any construction that they have frontage on a dedicated <br />City street. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Art Dunn voted Naye because of the fact that there is already au existing <br />building on this parcel. <br /> <br />Ron West voted Naye because of the hardship, he feels even though different <br />persons own the property that this is creating undue hardship to require <br />Minnesota Utilities to obtain a variance to get a building permit. <br /> <br />LEISUREWHEELS'- REQUEST'FOR'SIGN'PERMIT <br /> <br />Motion by Deemer, seconded by Hubbard to recommend approval of Leisure. <br />Wheels Inc., request for a sign advertising the.butane service providing: <br /> 1. They fill out the application and pay the fee <br /> 2. They move the sign at least five feet off the Might of Way <br /> of Highway 10 <br /> 3. A variance be granted on the size of the sign, <br /> (this' sign is 16 feet over the allOWable size) <br />Motion carried. 7-0. <br /> <br />STEVEN'WELSH'SIGN'PERMIT REQUEST <br /> <br />Motion by Peterson, seconded by Dunn to.recommend approval for a permit <br />for a free standing sign at 7445 Highway 10 as long as it conforms to the <br />ordinance and fees. <br /> <br />Notion carried. 7-0. <br /> <br />STEVEN'WELSHSITE'PLAN/DESIGN PLAN REVIt~. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsh was present to discuss his proposedaddition to his.building. He <br />presented an informal sketch, of the si~e. <br /> <br />A discussion was held. Regarding Engineer Raatikka's letter of review dated <br />9/4/79, Item No. 3, delete the por{ion that refers tm "sales". Regarding Item <br />No. 4~ drainage of water appears to be to the railroad property ~nd drainage <br />can't go onto railroad property. Mr. Welsh has to show how he can retain water <br />on his own area or direct it to public property. He plans to install a 10 foot <br />provacy fence. The sewer is to be put. in front of the facility. A discussion <br />held regarding whether his existing building is constructed on a floating slab <br />or with foo~ings and the present building Code requires footings which may <br />create a problem with adding onto this building. ~r. Welsh is to confer with <br />the building official on this problem. <br /> <br /> -7- <br />Rekrular P & Z Meetin~ - 9/~/79 <br /> <br /> <br />