Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kenneth Peterson <br />September 28, 1979 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />corner of the site will not drain into the drywetls,. The site <br />plans should be revised to show how the runoff from the entire <br />site will be disposed of . Maintaining all runoff on the site <br />may require property line Curbs. Also calculations of the size <br />and capacity of the existing dr~ells should be provided° <br /> <br />5., The site plans indicate that the driveway to the building will <br /> be class five gravel. We would recommend that this be changed <br /> to a hard, all-weather, dust-free surface as required for parking <br /> areas. <br /> <br />Since this proposed building is being placed in the rear of a <br />presently developed commercial lot, no buffering or boulevard <br />sodding should be required. <br /> <br />As previously discussed it does not appear likely that a service <br />drive will be constructed on the north edge of the site, However~ <br />we would recommend that rear yard setback of 35 feet be adhered to, <br />This would eliminate alternate site plan "A" as a possible Sayout. <br /> <br />If you have any questions in regard to this site plan please let us know~ <br /> <br />Yours truly, <br /> <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS DIVERSIFIED, INC. <br />Peter R. Raatikka, P.E. <br /> <br />CC: <br /> <br />Zoning Members <br />Lloyd Schnelle, City Adm. <br />Wally Berg <br /> <br />File: RT2:15-75 <br /> <br /> <br />