My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/04/80
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1980
>
02/04/80
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:39:48 PM
Creation date
9/1/2004 9:24:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
02/04/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ALPACA ESTATES - REVISED 'PRELIMINARY PLAT <br /> <br />Engineer Raatikka reviewed his letter of comment regarding this <br />plat with the Commission noting that Lot 5, Block S is deficient <br />mn area, variances will be required on Lot 1, Block 8 and 5-8, <br />Block 9. There are several required items still missing for <br />approval of this preliminary plat such as a grading plan and <br />State agencies approvals. <br /> <br />A discussion was held on the type of street to be installed <br />on 142nd and that it would be designated as a trail with an addit- <br />ional four foot on the south side. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Commission is that the proposed lot configuration <br />is okay. <br /> <br />Motion by Ben'..Deemer and seconded by Ron West to table .the approval <br />of Alpaca Estates. Preliminary_ Plat: until the required-data -is.__ <br />available'.' <br /> <br />Motion carried. 4 Ayes', Art Dunn abs. tained. <br /> <br />Mr. Paul Johnson, the 'planning consul:tant for Petrucci Enterprises-- <br />owner of the property, was present to present the sketch plan. <br /> <br />Engineer Raatikka reviewed his .r..eport regarding..the proposed plat.. <br />noting that it has only one 'access. : <br /> <br />Paul Johnson questioned if the intent of having two accesses <br />is for emergency vehicles, street maintenance and added that in <br />the future as the area develops they anticipate that additional <br />accesses' will be 'provided to that area and they concur with the <br />'temporary cul de sac. <br /> <br />it was noted that the park land shown does not meet the requirement <br />of the ordinance. Mr. Johnson stated that they are requesting <br />that park of the develQpment contract be that as the lot is approve <br />they would then make the.necessary dedication. They want to make <br />the NE lot an outlot and.develop it at a later date and have the <br />park dedication waived for that lot. <br /> <br />Engineer Raatikka, Administrator Schnelle and the Commission <br />advised Mr. Johnson that the outlot could be made part of the <br />plat and still be reserved for development. He was told that <br />the Council would probably be adverse to his creating an outlot. <br /> <br />Art Dunn explained that if the outlot were divided in the future <br />it would have to be subdivided at that time and he suggests that <br />it be included in the plat at this time and include the park <br />dedication in it now. <br /> <br />P & Z Regular Meeting <br /> 11/5/79 <br /> Page B <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.