06/07/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Clayton Berg stated that the portion of Mr. Nedry's residence used for the business.would be taxed commercially. Motion by Commissioner Schneider and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to approve the proposed findings of fact as they relate to Mr. Thomas Nedry's request to operate a locksmithing business in his residence located at 7501 - 152nd Lane NW. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Dunn, Zimmerman, Deemer, Schneider and LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Isakson. 'Commission discussed letter from R.W. Peterson and Mr. Berg commented that ordinance states that you cannot park more than a one ton truck in a platted area and the area being discussed tonight is unplatted. Mr. Berg further stated that he hopes this problem will be solved during recodification. (Mr. R.W. Peterson's letter not only opposed Mr. Nedry's request, but also included complaints that there is a beauty shop in the area already and semi- trucks are being parked in the area). Commissioner Schneider requested that Mr. Berg contact Mr. R.W. Peterson and explain that the parking of semi-trucks in the area will be resolved during recodification and that the beauty shop is paying commercial taxes. Motion by Commissioner Zimmerman and seconded by Commissioner Dunn to recommend approval of Mr. Thomas Nedry's request for a conditional use permit based on the findings of fact and further to include the following conditions: 1. That on-street parking be curtailed. 2. Retail sales shall not be advertised as a part of the business. 3. Advertisement sign shall be in compliance with City Ordinance. 4. Applicant shall be sole operator of the business. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Dunn, Zimmerman, Deemer, LaDue and'Schneider. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Isakson,.'~. Case #4: Mr. Lyle Illg; Request For Variance To Purchase 100' Wide Parcel: Mr. [yle Illg was present and stated he would like a variance to purchase a 100' wide parcel abutting his property from the rear in order to obtain access to his rear property. Mr. Illg stated that his current parcel is 100' wide also. Mr. Berg stated that approval of Mr. Illg's request would be a subdivision and create two other parcels. This subdivision does not comply with subdivision ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. Commission reviewed the situation and suggested that Mr. Illg negotiate a private agreement with the landowner. Case #3: Informational: Commission discussed the final decisions made by City Council regarding Phelp's and Gilbertson cases. Commission agreed that the Phelps case is setting a precedence. Commissioner Deemer noted, regarding Gilbertson case, the addition of Item #11 P & Z/May 3, 1983 Page 3 of 5