07/12/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

i I I I I I I I Mr. Kenneth Peterson, Chairman?r' - 2 - July 6, 1983 5 Ge 5 J 10. ll. 12. The proposed location of the rural commercial development is consistent with the City's future land use plan. However, the size of the area proposed rural commercial development is somewhat larger than shown on the proposed 1990 zoning map. This area will require rezoning prior to development. In conjunction with the plan, the developers on the north half of the project are proposing to give fee title of the golf course fairways to the City. This donation would be with the understanding that the City in turn convey the land for $1.00 to Wesley Bulen who would manage the golf course. The developers are also requesting use (by lease agreement) of the City Park in White Pines Estates for golf course development. The___se ~tems_ should be reviewed by the City Attorney. In review of the drainage to the development, an outlet to the Rum River should be constructed. In review of access to the commercial development and golf course, the proposed access at State Trunk Highway No. 47 was not shown on the plan. In addition, the right of way along S.T.H. No. 47 will have to be widened to allow for future upgrading. The access to the residential lots is proposed from S.T.H. No. 47 at 169th Avenue N.W. This street would extend to Helium Street, eliminating a long cul-de-sac. However, the development plan shows a cul-de-sac to the south off 169th Avenue which exceeds the cul-de-sac length allowed by City Code. In review of the Anoka County Soil Survey, the soils primarily consist of Dalbo silt loam, Dickman sandy loam and N~a~ore loamy sand which are Class I soils suitable for on-site wastewater disposal systems. In review of the preliminary development plan requirements of the City Code, the drawing did not show contours, topography, location of buildings, plans for distribution of sanitary wastes and storm water and plans for parking. The sketch plan did not show any park dedication. Therefore, it will be subject to cash payment in lieu of park dedication. I have reviewed this development with the developer and he feels items 2, and 11 raise certain legal questions that should be answered by the City Attorney.