Laserfiche WebLink
- 4 - <br /> <br />adopted Metropolitan Council Water Quality Management Policy <br />Plan recommends that ge~eral rural use areas are to be <br />designated in local comprehensive plans and that a maximum <br />development density of one unit per 10 acres be established <br />in the plan for these lands or one unit per 40 acres in <br />commercial agricultural lands. Appropriate standards for <br />the location, management and maintenance of on-site sewage <br />disposal systems are to be developed and adopted. The level <br />of standards may vary depending on the city's proposed <br />density maxim in the rural service area. <br /> <br />The Ramsey Critical Area land use plan conflicts with <br />Critical Area standards and Metropolitan Development <br />Framework policies in significant ways. The land use plan <br />does not clearly distinguish between the rural service and <br />urban service areas within the river corridor. Industrial <br />and commercial land uses are proposed in the river corridor <br />outside as well as within the MUSA area designated by the <br />Metropolitan Council and in the'Critical Area rural open <br />space district. The proposed minimum lot size in unsewered <br />areas would be 2.5 acres per dwelling unit. (In areas <br />scheduled for sewers within five years smaller lots would be <br />allowed but these would not exceed a density of one unit per <br />acre until the utilities are available. Finally, the <br />proposed industrial and expanded commercial uses although <br />reduced in area from the existing plan conflict with the <br />rural service area policies, requirements of the Critical <br />Area rural open space and urban developed districts. Also, <br />the Wild and Scenic River rule.5 an.~d..regulations prohibit <br />such uses in the river corridor. <br /> <br />The plan indicates that high-rise uses would' not be allowed <br />in the river corridor but commercial structures as tall as <br />45 feet would be permitted. This conflicts with the 35-foot <br />height limit under the Wild and Scenic River designation. <br />However, it is not clear whether these building heights <br />would be visible from the river and have a visual impact. <br /> <br />Public facilities element <br />a. Transportation plan <br /> <br />The plan acknowledges and describes hazardous traffic <br />accesses on U.S. Highway 10, due to the lack of <br />controlled access and service roads, and contains <br />policies to limit local accesses to one mile intervals, <br />require developers to provide service roads and provide <br />local collectors. The need for and timing of these <br />impPovements will depend on the types of land uses and <br />timng of urban development along the river corridon. A <br />letter received from the Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation supports these recommendations. A copy <br />is attached. <br /> <br /> <br />