My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/12/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 02/12/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:00:54 PM
Creation date
9/3/2004 9:02:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/12/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A discussion was held regarding "clear cutti.ng~.. <br /> <br />Mr. Marston stated that clear cutting would be discouraged but only <br />prohibited within a 100' distance of the Rum River, Mississippi River <br />and any of the public bodies of water. <br /> <br />Art Dunn asked what the definition of clear cutting is~ Reference <br />was made to Page 68 of the Critical River Ordinance. <br /> <br />Art Dunn commented that he feels that prohibiting cutting of trees will <br />conflict with solar access and this is something we are trying to encourage. <br />To not allow cutting of trees would defe~t this aspect. <br /> <br />Mr. Marston agreed that there are some conflicts, the obvious one being, <br />solar and woodland protection within so much area of bodies of water so <br />the Commission may want to put more emphasis on woodland protection° <br /> <br />Policies for solar accessplan are needed~-~- <br /> <br />Ben Deemer reported that the only place where the City has significant tree <br />population is along the water courses and in areas that are already developed. <br /> <br />Ron West stated that the original plan stated that 50 percent of the trees <br />could be clear cut and 50 percent were to preserved. He feels this is <br />adequate to incorporate solar energy. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson asked if the Commission wants to apply the 50 percent figure. <br /> <br />Mr. Marston spoke on clear cutting, saying that this Would allow for removal <br />of some trees but not all of them, 50% isn't clear cutting, Is this the <br />sort of provision that should be applied to the co~unity as a whole or do <br />we want this for shoreline areas and something less restrictive for the <br />other areas? <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson asked if this is in the plan, how can it be enforced? <br /> <br />Ron West repl~d that it could only be enforced on new developments or plats. <br /> <br />Regarding the industrial or commercial districts, trees could not be preserved <br />in thoses cases~ this should apply only to residential areas. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson noted that the site plan/building design plan ~pproval <br />provided for commercial or industrial developers to replant trees, shrubs <br />and create green areas. <br /> <br />Ben Deemer added that where there are cases where more trees have to be <br />cut down, it could be more rigidly enforced to having them replant. <br /> <br />Ths following areas were specifically noted: <br /> <br />The City wants to maintain control over a developer who comes <br />in who has trees on his property, some control should be maintained <br />on this.~ <br /> <br />Along the shoreline areas, consensus is to maintains50% crown <br /> <br /> WORKSHOP MEETING <br /> PLANNING & ZONING <br /> January 15, 1980 Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.