Laserfiche WebLink
Name: Future Business Park Traffic Memorandum <br /> Date: January 27,2017 <br /> Page: 4 <br /> Table 1: Design Year(2040)with Existing Lanes <br /> Limiting Max Approach Queue <br /> Intersection Maximum Max <br /> Traffic Control Scenario Peak Hour Movement Average <br /> Delay*-LOS Delay-LOS** *** Direction Queue(ft) <br /> Queue(ft) **** <br /> Design Year 2040 Alternative 2 <br /> TH 10/169 South Ramp&CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd) AM 13 B 24 C EBL EBL 105 174 <br /> Signal PM 12 B 22 C EBL EBL 98 148 <br /> TH 10/169 North Ramp&CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd) AM 63 E 143 F WBR WBT/R 468 1152 <br /> Signal PM 71 E 124 F WBR WBT/R 595 1560 <br /> CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd&147th Avenue AM 55 D 131 F NBL NBT 759 1327 <br /> Signal PM 52 D 87 F NBL NBT 660 1252 <br /> CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd)&CSAH 116(Bunker Lake Blvd) AM 69 E 184 F NBL NBT 784 1086 <br /> Signal assumed double SBL&double WBL were stripped) PM 100 227 F NBL NBT 733 1109 <br /> CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd)&Alpine Drive NW AM 5 A 20 C EBT EBLJT 45 114 <br /> TWSC PM 9 A 46 E EBL NBUT 68 167 <br /> Alpine Drive NW&Puma Street NW AM 2 A 7 A NBL NBLJR 31 54 <br /> TWSC PM 3 A 9 A NBL NBUT 51 86 <br /> Puma Street NW&Bunker Lake Blvd AM 3 A 9 A NBT SBIJT/R 50 75 <br /> Option 1:AWSC PM 4 A 7 A WBR WBT/R 56 86 <br /> Puma.Street NW&Bunker Lake Blvd AM 0 A 3 A EBR EB LIR 4 is <br /> Option 2:3 Legged intersection with curve PM 0 A 2 A EBL EBUR 7 24 <br /> Puma Street NW&Bunker Lake Blvd AM 2 A 5 A NBT SB1JT/R 16 51 <br /> Option 3:Roundabout PM 2 A 4 A SBT SBLJT/R 4 23 <br /> *Delay in seconds per vehicle <br /> **Maximum delay and LOS on any approach and/or movement <br /> ***Lemiting Movement is the highest delay movement. <br /> ****Max Queue refers to the 95%Queue(Passenger car stored length=25 ft,Heavy vehicle stored length=45 ft) <br /> Analysis indicates that it there are anticipated to be capacity concerns along Armstrong <br /> Blvd from Highway 10 to Bunker Lake Blvd.Mitigation is necessary at the intersection <br /> of Armstrong Blvd at Bunker Lake Blvd. <br /> 2. 2040 Full Build with Mitigation <br /> Table 2: Design Year(2040)with Mitigation <br /> Limiting Max Approach Queue <br /> Traffic Control Scenario Peak Hour Intersection Maximum Movement Average Max <br /> Delay*-LOS Delay-LOS** *** Direction Queue(ft) <br /> Queue(ft) **** <br /> Design Year 2040 Alternative 2 <br /> TH UY169 South Ramp&CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd) AM 11 B 22 C EBL EBL 95 147 <br /> Signal PM 12 B 23 C EBL SBR 47 171 <br /> TH 10/169 North Ramp&CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd) AM 21 C 53 D SBT SBT 382 727 <br /> Signal PM 49 D 141 F SBT SBT 809 1272 <br /> CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd&147th Avenue AM 12 B 33 C SBL NBT 199 376 <br /> Signal PM 56 E 111 F SBT SBT 664 1232 <br /> CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd)&CSAH 116(Bunker Lake Blvd) AM 38 D 84 F NBL NBT 353 868 <br /> Signal Added double EB thru, ee right) PM 1 50 D 139 1 F WBL WBT 401 915 <br /> CSAH 83(Armstrong Blvd)&Alpine Drive NW AM 5 A 26 D WBL EBR 61 110 <br /> TWSC Added EB/WB RT lune PM 10 B 88 F EBT NBUT 77 171 <br /> Alpine Drive NW&Puma Street NW AM 2 A 6 A WBL NBUR 33 56 <br /> TWSC PM 3 A 9 A NBL NBIJT 48 80 <br /> Puma Street NW&Bunker Lake Blvd AM 3 A 9 A WBL SBLJT/R 50 78 <br /> Option]:A WSC PM 4 A 8 A WBL WBIJT/R 57 83 <br /> Puma Street NW&Bunker Lake Blvd AM 0 A 3 A EBL EBUR 4 18 <br /> Option 2:3 Legged intersection with curve PM 0 A 5 A EBL EBUR 6 24 <br /> Puma Street NW&Bunker Lake Blvd AM 2 A 5 A NBT SBIJT/R 11 37 <br /> Option 3:Roundabout PM 2 A 4 A EBT SBI/T/R 3 21 <br /> *Delay in seconds per vehicle <br /> **Maximmmdelay and LOS on any approach and/or movement <br /> ***Limiting Movement is the highest delay movement. <br /> ** <br /> **Max Queue refers to the 95%Queue(Passenger car stored length=25 f[,Heavy vehicle stored length=45 it) <br /> Analysis indicates <br /> Bouton$Menk is an equal opportunity employer. <br />