Laserfiche WebLink
TO: Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: Ramsey City Staff <br /> <br />RE: Staff comments as related to the findings of fact. <br />DATE: March 26, 1980 <br /> <br />1) In view of the fact that the criteria for determining a buildable <br />lot is established by City ordinance the City assessing policy has to <br />be consistant with the ordinance. If the City fails to be consistant <br />it is liable to establish a precedence that they will not be able to <br />~work with in the future. <br /> <br />2) Financing of this public improvement project ~ The financing of <br />this project was wholly financed by the individually benefitted property <br />owners. Consequently, the deletion of any unitsthat were assessed <br />will mean that the costs of these benefits must be paid by interest <br />earned on revenues from prepaid assessments and other interests earned <br />from bond money during construction. It should be noted by the City <br />Council that there will be a certain amount of tax forfeit land where <br />assessments will not be paid on a given project during thepay-off <br />span. It should also be noted that the bond issue was for $950,000 <br />which covered a total of nine projects. Consequently,~the law requires <br />that each preceedingyear of a bond payment there is adequate funding <br />in the respective bond to cover principal and interest for the forth-' <br />coming year. If the bond fund does not have adequate funds in the pre-. <br />ceeding year or for the forth coming year (October 12) then the City is <br />required by law to levy by ad volarm tax the additional funds necessary. <br /> <br />3) Public hearing setting assessment roles - The public hearing that <br />establishes the assessment roles is the most critical part of the total <br />project as it receives the engineering report on the total cost~ total <br />units to be assessed and units not to be assessed because of lack of <br />benefit. Secondly, it receives citizen input on aspects of the project <br />construction or lack of benefit. Thirdly, the City Council takes the <br />final action determining who will be assessed, who will not be assessed <br />for the lack of benefit, and sets unit costs for those benefitted to <br />cover the project cost. <br /> <br />4) After assessment roles have been established by the City Council, <br />any further deletion or deferment of assessments should only be con- <br />sidered in very unique situations and should not be outside the City's <br />criteria for determining a buildable lot as established by City Ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br />