Laserfiche WebLink
The Comprehensive Plan will need to be adjusted slightly to reflect the proposal. <br /> Planned Unit Development <br /> The site is comprised of a mix of R-2 Residential and R-3 Residential to match the Comprehensive Plan addressed <br /> above.While a majority of the proposal appears to meet minimum zoning standards,there areas that may deviate <br /> slightly from minimums. In addition, a significant amount of open space, of value to the project,may impact net <br /> density. Finally,the site is being planned as a whole, and phased over time. Due to these layers of review, a Planned <br /> Unit Development may be an appropriate tool to employ at this time. <br /> Mandatory Environmental Review <br /> Due to the number of units,which is a mix of attached and unattached units, State Rules require this project to <br /> completed an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. A brief synopsis of this process is attached to this case. <br /> Park Dedication and Trail Fees <br /> A total of 334 residential units (estimated),of single family homes+townhomes are proposed to be platted in <br /> phases over the next several years. Park Dedication(cash contribution)and Trail Fees would typically be calculated <br /> per the existing fee schedule at the time of development of each phase. Preliminary discussions with the Developer <br /> indicate they may be requesting some Park Dedication credit for private open space within the proposed plat. Staff <br /> has explained the longstanding policy of not requiring or encouraging public 'pocket parks',but rather planning for, <br /> and providing Park Dedication and Trail Fee credit for building trail connections within the community, and <br /> investing in larger, quality neighborhood and community parks. The Developer may still include private open space <br /> and park-like amenities within the subdivision;however the Park and Recreation Commission is likely to <br /> recommend either that Park Dedication (and Trail Fees)be satisfied in cash,or specified improvements that have <br /> accessible, recreational value to the community outside of the interior of the proposed subdivision. Examples of <br /> specified, Park Dedication eligible improvements include: <br /> .,,,,a o4_i__gt4 ,.+,ail(s4 Staff is now evaluating a roundabout concept on Alpine Drive. <br /> . Segments of the proposed greenway trail between Lake Itasca Park and The COR(within or adjacent to the <br /> proposed plat) <br /> .Improvements to Lake Itasca Park, E.g. boardwalk or pier connection to the lake, canoe/kayak station, <br /> parking areas, or park development plans <br /> .Trailside improvements to the trail alongside Puma St.,which is also an element of the Mississippi River <br /> Trail(and U.S. Bikeway 445) <br /> .Any number of potential enhancements/development to the park system in The COR, Eg. splash pad, site <br /> development for the water-centric park, or the proposed Municipal Plaza(Happy Days location)—all of <br /> which would be of benefit to new residents of Capstone's proposed project. <br /> Arterial Infrastructure Cost Share <br /> The development of the Capstone project, and the City's future business park,will result in the need to construct/ <br /> upgrade arterial infrastructure located along Bunker Lake Boulevard/Puma Street. Resolution of cost-share <br /> agreements for the proposed arterial infrastructure improvements is outstanding and will be subject of negotiation. <br /> On 12/13/2016,the Council authorized Bolton &Menk to update their arterial infrastructure study for this area,to <br /> aid that discussion. That study should be completed, and back to the Council,by early March (potentially February). <br /> Capstone is paying for 50%of that update study. <br /> As outlined with the Council in the 12/13/2016 work session,the City should anticipate the need (or request)to <br /> fund the initial cost of arterial infrastructure related to the new business park that impacts the Hageman Holdings <br /> properties. Hagemann Holdings has indicated that they would oppose any additional assessments at this time. <br /> Likewise, Capstone representatives have indicated to staff they would not be able to move forward with their <br /> proposed development without sharing the cost of the arterial infrastructure needed to reach the development. <br />