Laserfiche WebLink
Park and Recreation Commission 5. 2. <br /> Meeting Date: 02/09/2017 <br /> By: Mark Riverblood, Engineering/Public <br /> Works <br /> Information <br /> Title: <br /> Approve Policy Document and Review Concept Plan for Pearson Farm; Case of Capstone Homes <br /> Purpose/Background: <br /> The purpose of this case is to provide preliminary feedback for a future plat currently known as Pearson Farm. This <br /> is not an official application at this time,but does merit a policy discussion on several aspects of the proposed <br /> subdivision: <br /> 1. Land Use (Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District) <br /> 2. Mandatory Environmental Review <br /> 3. Park Dedication and Trail Fees (cash contribution or specified improvements) <br /> 4. Regional Infrastructure <br /> Notification: <br /> Notification is not required at this time,but will occur with future steps. <br /> Observations/Alternatives: <br /> This case is an update to a previous case reviewed by the Planning and Park and Recreation Commissions. This <br /> project is still in concept stage. Discussions continue on key policy topics with the Developer. The list below is a <br /> summary of updates since the Commission's reviews on January 5, and January 12th 2017. <br /> 1. The concept is still fluid in nature. Final layout is being modified due to grading and stormwater depth <br /> information. <br /> 2. Staff has expanded the original policy topics from abstract to initial recommendations and action items. <br /> 3. The City Council has recommended that there be two (2) access points on Alpine Drive. Staff originally had <br /> concerns about two (2) access points. Staff is evaluating options that balance traffic safety and accessibility. <br /> 4. The City Council has noted that the City will need to be cognizant of the establishment of a Home Owners' <br /> Association due to the private, shared improvements. The City has has negative experiences in at least two <br /> (2)projects with these types of improvements when the HOA was not properly established. <br /> Original Review <br /> As this is a conceptual plan at this point, Staff is forwarding at this stage to introduce the concept early, especially <br /> in light of mandatory environmental review required by State Law. The Developer desires initial feedback on the <br /> concept before starting the official review process. The entire review process (City, State,Watershed, etc.)may <br /> mean a construction start date of approximately July 2017 or later. <br /> The following is a synopsis of key issues and opportunities associated with the aforementioned subdivision <br /> processes and requirements. <br /> Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br /> The proposed concept appears generally in line with the Comprehensive Plan,which guides this area for a mix of <br /> medium density residential (3-7 units per acre)and a small portion of high density residential (7-15 units per acre). <br /> However,the boundaries of the Land Use Districts do not match exactly that of the proposed development concept. <br />