Laserfiche WebLink
Rule -By -Rule Analysis <br />6106.0010 Policy <br />The policy statement for the proposed MRCCA rules is derived from and consistent with Executive Order <br />79-19 and the original Executive Order 130 (1976), which established the MRCCA within the Twin Cities <br />Metropolitan area. The MRCCA rules are intended to use coordinated planning to "achieve <br />development [within the MRCCA] as a multipurpose resource, resolve the conflicts of use of land and <br />water, preserve and enhance its natural, aesthetic, cultural, and historical value for the public use, and <br />protect its environmentally sensitive areas." <br />6106.0020 Purpose <br />The five statements of purpose for the MRCCA rules are drawn from Minn. Stat. § 116G.15, Subd. 1 <br />(2015) and reflect the purposes of the MRCCA designation as set forth in Executive Order 79-19 (Section <br />A, 3 S.R. 1692, Standards and Guidelines for Preparing Plans and Regulations). <br />6106.0030 Scope <br />This part lays out the jurisdiction and scope of the rules, the general roles and responsibilities of <br />governmental entities with jurisdiction or property within the MRCCA in furthering the purposes of the <br />rules, and the applicability of conflicting rules, ordinances and regulations to the MRCCA: <br />Subpart 1: Applicability. The proposed MRCCA rules are applicable to all lands and public waters within <br />the jurisdictional boundaries of the MRCCA. <br />Subparts 2 and 3: Government actions and state land. These subparts specify the general <br />responsibilities of all governmental units with jurisdiction or property within the MRCCA for furthering <br />the purposes of the proposed MRCCA rules as provided by Minn. Stat. § 116G.15, subd. 5 (2015). These <br />rules are applicable to state and local units of government. <br />Subpart4: Conflicting standards. This subpart addresses the issue of conflicts between the proposed <br />MRCCA rules and local ordinances, state rules, or any other regulation. Where such a conflict exists, the <br />most protective provisions apply. This is consistent with similar provisions in many other state rules. <br />Subpart 5: Superseding standards. This subpart clarifies that the proposed MRCCA rules supersede the <br />Environmental Quality Board (EQB) rules with respect to management of the MRCCA. The EQB rules, <br />Minn. R. 4410.8100 to 4410.9910 (2015), will remain, however, as they are applicable to the designation <br />and administration of other critical areas in general. The MRCCA is the only critical area in existence at <br />the time that these rules are being proposed. <br />6106.0050 Definitions <br />In the course of developing the proposed MRCCA rules, 86 terms were identified as requiring <br />definitions. It was important to define these particular terms because many will be incorporated into <br />local zoning ordinances, and consistency in terminology across the MRCCA is essential. Many of the <br />definitions borrowed heavily from definitions already used by local government in existing ordinances. <br />Of these terms and definitions: <br />29 <br />