My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:27:24 AM
Creation date
3/14/2017 1:32:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/02/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water Oriented Accessory Structure <br />A water oriented accessory structure refers to recreational amenities that are commonly constructed <br />closer to the shoreline than a typical structure. Proposed Minn. R. 6106.0050, subp. 84. Under the <br />proposed rules, these structures are allowed on riparian lots within the required setback from the <br />ordinary high water level subject to specific standards in proposed Minn. R. 6106.0140, subp. 5.D. It is <br />reasonable to clarify the types of structures that are allowed closer to the water, and to place limits on <br />the dimensions of these structures to minimize negative impacts to sensitive shoreline areas. The <br />dimensions chosen are consistent with the sizes of many existing structures within the MRCCA. <br />6106.0060 Administration of Program <br />Part 6106.0060 of the proposed MRCCA rules lay out the specific roles, responsibilities, and authorities <br />for administering the proposed rules. Many provisions are drawn directly from Minn. Stat. § 116.15, <br />subd. 2 (2015), Executive Order 79-19, and/or the state environmental review rules set out in Minn. R. <br />Ch. 4410. Below, by subpart, is a brief description of the pertinent requirements for the administration <br />of the MRCCA program with special emphasis on new or revised provisions. <br />Subpart 1. Purpose, terms, and timeframes. This subpart clarifies that the "plan[s] and ordinance[s]" <br />specified in the MRCCA rules only pertain to those plans and ordinances prepared by local governments <br />to implement the rules in the MRCCA. It is not the intent of the MRCCA rules that the provisions in the <br />rules should apply to any other local plans or ordinances. The subpart also clarifies that all time frames <br />referenced in the MRCCA rules are measured in calendar days. <br />Subpart2. Responsibilities and authorities. This subpart establishes the roles and responsibilities of the <br />governmental authorities involved in implementing the MRCCA program, including the commissioner of <br />natural resource; the Metropolitan Council; local governments; and state or regional agencies, local park <br />agencies, and special purpose units of government. Proposed Minn. R. 6106.0060, subp. 2. Most local <br />governments currently have MRCCA plans and ordinances in place. This is consistent with Executive <br />Order 79-19 and the MRCCA program's administration. <br />Subpart 3. Consistent plans and ordinances. Consistency is a fundamental element of the MRCCA <br />program thus, under this subpart, local governments must adopt, administer, and enforce plans and <br />ordinances within the MRCCA that are consistent with the MRCCA rules. For purposes of the MRCCA <br />rules, "consistency," means that local plans and ordinances must meet the purpose, scope, and the <br />numeric thresholds set forth in the MRCCA rules, but may vary in structure or wording. To deviate from <br />this consistency standard the local government must request flexibility, as provided in proposed Minn. <br />R. 6106.0070, subp. 6.B. This provision is necessary in order to provide local governments with the <br />explicit standards that DNR will use when it reviews local plans and ordinances. Local governments <br />expressly requested this provision. The concept of consistency is a reasonable expectation for local plans <br />and ordinances. <br />Subpart4. Greater restrictions. Although the MRCCA rules require consistency with minimum <br />standards, local governments are allowed to adopt and enforce plans and ordinances that are more <br />restrictive than the standards in the MRCCA rules. The MRCCA rules are intended as minimum <br />standards. It is reasonable to allow local governments to adopt and enforce more restrictive standards <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.