Laserfiche WebLink
NA <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Questions Received by Saff: <br />(1) Why does Stone Brook want to be located on Site #1 Why is being located near the center of The COR <br />important? Please see attached log for Site #1. Please see feedback from Stone Brook. <br />(2) Why does the pad ready site located north of Coborn's (the McDonald's sites, Site #2), not work for Stone <br />Brook? Please see attached log for Site #2. Please see feedback from Stone Brook. <br />(3) Is Stone Brook a daycare or a pre-school? Please see attached log for Site #1. Please see feedback from <br />Stone Brook. <br />Attached: <br />(1) background information (project, owners, benefits, term sheet). <br />(2) log for Site #1 and Site #2. Both updated (Council & Stone Brook comments added, simplified). <br />(3) MEMOs from CBRE. <br />(4) four site concepts (as requested by Council for PC to review) <br />(5) former Dominium senior apartment complex proposal. 120+ units, first floor parking. This proposal is not <br />allowed via the existing zoning disrict (i.e. COR-2 retail). In 2015, the City indicated they did not want to <br />see this project on this site, as it didn't fit the vision. This was added for reference purposes only. <br />Funding Source: <br />NA <br />Recommendation: <br />NA <br />Action: <br />A) Provide City Council with direction on the attached four site layout concepts (are they acceptable --if not, <br />specifically why?) <br />B) Provide Council with final feedback RE the proposed project on Site #1 (feedback on their proposed site plan <br />concept?) <br />SITE 1 <br />Four Master Planned Sites (COR 2 Zoning) <br />Former Dominium Concept 2015 <br />CBRE MEMOS (2) <br />Background <br />SITE 2 <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Patrick Brama Patrick Brama 02/01/2017 03:24 PM <br />Form Started By: JoAnn Shaw Started On: 01/30/2017 12:11 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 02/01/2017 <br />