Agenda - Council - 05/13/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CASE #13: What this will accomplish is to eliminate a lot of ill feel- ing with people expanding their non conforming use business which they are not supposed to be doing. b) Establishing Administrative Procedure Regarding the City Mining Ordinance: Inasmuch as the City adopted its mining ordinance by reference from the Uniform Building Code, there are certain administrative procedures that Council should establish a policy in regards to what they want administered. The following are submitted as requiring a need for a policy decision: 1) Plan check fee - Do we use the fee as set up in the Uniform Building Code. 2) Grading Permit Fee - Do we use the fee as set up in the Uniform Building Code. 3) Does Council want to review all plans for excavation. It would be nV recommendation that Council review all plans before a permit is issued and require a signed agreement between the City and the miner. We should insist on the following things to be accomplished: a) Fencing around mining area, b) Landscaping area and planging of vegetation after mining operation is completed, c) Gate on road to mining area to keep people from hauling trash into area, d) Mining area should be allowed only where the roads serving it are of a nine (9) ton construction, and e) We should have the miner post bond to cover restora- tion and street repair if damaged by miner. Enclosure (D3-j) contains a copy of our present mining ordi- nance which we just adopted by reference. ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT: The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the lack of ordi- nance enforcement and they raised some very good points. As they feel the City should have a strict enforcement of Code not selective enforcement of the Code. Consequently, we need Council policy on this matter and it should be discussed so Council has a complete picture of the whole thing.