Laserfiche WebLink
utility property for distribution to local units <br />of government, the Board may, by majority vote, <br />committ the League to support such a proposal in <br />lieu of the electric gross revenues tax described <br />above. <br /> <br />Property tax administration <br /> <br /> In recent years, initiatives in state and local <br />fiscal policy have focused on avoiding increases <br />in the tax burden on local property by providing <br />alternate sources of revenue. The League believes, <br />however, that a number of reforms in the property <br />tax system itself are needed to make it a more <br />equitable revenue instrument, including the follow- <br />ing: <br /> <br />The fact that federally and state-subsidized <br />housing units are assessed differently <br />in the cities depending on the city's popu- <br />lation creates a disincentive for cities of <br />less than 10,000 population to accommo- <br />date such housing. This assessment dis- <br />parity should be eliminated. <br /> <br />2. All property tax laws should be recodified. <br /> <br />The number of classifications of property <br />for property tax purposes should be <br />reduced. <br /> <br />Clarification of the prohibition against <br />local sales and income tax <br /> <br /> The current statutory provision which prohi- <br />bits cities from increasing a present tax or enact- <br />ing a new tax on sales or income has been inter- <br />preted to prohibit not only a local general sales <br />or income tax, but also special taxes such as ad- <br />missions taxes. The League recommends that the <br />statute be amended to clarify that cities may im- <br />pose special local taxes including but not limited <br />to hotel and motel taxes and admissions taxes. <br /> <br />Taxation and assessment of railroads <br /> <br /> The Legislature in 1979 adopted a new system <br />for the taxation of railroad property. This will <br />result in increased valuations for some cities. <br />However, those cities under the overall levy limi- <br />tation would not benefit from this increased valua- <br />tion unless their levy limit base could be modified <br />to reflect this additional new property. The League, <br />therefore, recommends that the levy limit base of <br />a governmental subdivision be increased by the <br />amount determined by multiplying the 1979 mill <br />levy of the governmental subdivision by the total <br />increase in assessed value of railroad property in <br />the governmental subdivision as a result of the <br />passage of the new law relating to taxation of <br />rail road property. <br /> <br /> As a result of recent court decisions, the entire <br />special assessment process has been modified. <br />Railroad property should be subject to special <br />assessment as is all other commercial, industrial, <br />and other property in the state. <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES <br /> <br />Ph il osoph y <br /> <br /> The Sixties and Seventies taught that natural <br />resources are limited and governmental spending <br />is finite. Community development planning was <br />recognized as necessary to focus local energies in <br />a constructive manner. Developmental and fiscal <br />tools were created and legislated and technical <br />competence was acquired to implement these <br />policies. Governmental funding was poured into <br />the community development process. <br /> <br /> The Eighties should be a decade of action. <br />With the focus, funding, tools, technical compe- <br /> <br />tence, and motivation to act, we must coordinate <br />and channel our efforts. We are in a transition from <br />a "throw-away" society to a "reuse and recycle" <br />society. We cannot afford to waste the substantial <br />capital investment already made by the cities and <br />private sector. We must build on this investment: <br />to reinvest, to the extent possible, in our existing <br />cities with their in-place infrastructures; and to <br />manage our economic growth in a manner that <br />will maximize the use of this investment in order <br />to hold down the cost of .public and private ser- <br />vices and energy necessary to support this econ- <br />omic growth. <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br /> <br />