My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/27/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 05/27/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:19:21 PM
Creation date
9/8/2004 8:49:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/27/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the disposal problem. Hazardous waste <br />generators must be encouraged to modify <br />production processes to reuse or recover <br />as much waste as possible and to use less <br />hazardous raw materials in their process· <br />Hazardous waste generators must be re- <br />quired to handle the wastes that are pro- <br />duced in such a way that will allow these <br />wastes to be identified, collected and recy- <br />cled or to be disposed of in a techno~ogica] <br />and environmentally sound manner. Deter- <br />mination must be made of the types of <br />disposal facilities needed, how many, <br />and the general geographic locations prior <br />to the siting process. Site selection rules <br />and criteria must be adopted prior to the <br />siting process and must be subject to ex- <br />haustive public hearings and Chapter 15 <br />Administrative Procedures Act require- <br />ments. The state as a whole should be <br />considered when selecting the site or sites <br />for resource recovery and/or disposal <br />of hazardous wastes. Incineration as a <br />means of disposal or as a volume reduction <br />technique should be given serious con- <br />sideration as part of the disposal system. <br />If landfilling of various types of hazardous <br />waste becomes necessary, prime criteria <br />consideration should be given to geolo- <br />gical acceptability of various sites and <br />technological fail/safe design of the facility. <br /> <br /> Participation in planning process. All the <br /> levels of local governments, including <br /> cities, together with private industry, <br /> must be encouraged and enabled to parti- <br /> cipate in the entire planning process and <br /> also to provide solutions to the problems <br /> where feasible. Resource recovery systems <br /> and landfilling of solid wastes are appro- <br /> priate roles for local government. Because <br /> of the complexity of dealing with hazar- <br /> dous wastes, a state agency should have <br />· the primary responsibility for operation <br /> of hazardous wastes recycling and landfill <br /> facilities, to the extent that hazardous <br /> waste disposal solutions are not forth- <br /> coming from private industry. <br /> <br />Incentives. Because the sites for the dis- <br />posal of solid and hazardous waste will <br />be located within the geographical boun- <br />daries of political subdivisions, incentives <br />should be provided by the state to both the <br />host of facility, and the local governmental <br />unit establishing and maintaining the <br /> <br />facility. Specifically, consideration should <br />be given to payments in lieu of taxes to <br />the host community for the property re- <br />moved from the tax rolls as a result of <br />the location of a facility. The host com- <br />munity and the community operating or <br />maintaining the facility should be protec- <br />ted by the state from severe liability pro- <br />blems. Grants should be made available <br />to communities operating innovative land- <br />fills. A special levy must be established <br />outside of levy limitations to pay for the <br />costs of operating and maintaining a land- <br />fill, in order to assure that adequate funds <br />will be available to implement environ- <br />mental protection measures. <br /> <br />Transportation <br /> <br /> An efficient transportation system is a vital <br />element in planning for physical, economic and <br />social development at state, regional and local <br />levels. Furthermore, environmental concerns and <br />the need to conserve energy require that alternate <br />modes of transportation be utilized in meeting <br />the diverse needs which exist in various com- <br />munities and regions of the state. In order to <br />provide a more adequate state governmental <br />structure and funding mechanism for transpor- <br />tation system planning and development, the <br />League recommends that the following changes <br />be made. <br /> <br />An adequate level of the Highway User <br />Fund should be maintained so that high- <br />way maintenance may be continued, <br />additional highway construction may oc- <br />cur, and adequate funds are available for <br />the state-aid street program. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />The special state bonding program should <br />be continued to provide funds to coun- <br />ties, towns and municipalities for the re- <br />placement or repair of bridges. <br /> <br />Municipalities and counties should be <br />permitted greater flexibility in the use of <br />state-aid street and highway funds to meet <br />their individual transportation needs <br />through the substitution of state general <br />funds for dedicated funds where needed <br />at the option of the affected unit without <br />changing the present dedicated funds, <br />or affecting funds available to other units. <br />This could be accomplished by a signi- <br />.ficant appropriation to the municipal state- <br />aid funds from state general revenue funds. <br /> <br />- 23 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.