Laserfiche WebLink
The possibility and feasibility of utilizing <br />existing railroad trackage as part of a fixed <br />guideway and/or light rail mass transit <br />system should be addressed and, if exist- <br />lng railroad trackage/right-of-ways are <br />petitioned for abandonment, these should <br />be preserved by the state through alternate <br />public use until rail systems once again <br />become economically feasible or needed <br />because of energy considerations. <br /> <br />a building or improvement is not designed <br />by an architect, engineer or contractor, <br />or inspected by a local building official, <br />then the state shall provide a fee inspector <br />who shall inspect the building or improve- <br />ment and certify that it comp.lies with the <br />energy code. This certification must be <br />completed before any city or county may <br />issue a certificate of occupancy or final <br />inspection for thebuilding. <br /> <br />Eminent domain law <br /> <br /> In recent years, amendments have been made <br />to the eminent domain law in an effort to safe- <br />guard the interests of the property owners who <br />become involved in this process. Taken as a Whole, <br />however, the present procedure seems to result in <br />the public paying excessively high prices for land. <br />Therefore, the League believes the entire process <br />pcovided in the law should be critically reviewed <br />and streamlined. This examination should include <br />a re-evalualion of the advisability of making appra- <br />isals public information; the advisability of using <br />a professional referee in lieu of three commis- <br />s;oners to establish the value of land;and the legal- <br />ity and feasilibility of collecting property taxes <br />on pcoperty for several prior years in instances <br />where the award is substantially in excess of the <br />ma~'ket value of the property for tax purposes. <br />The League Board should establish a task force <br />to study eminent domain, its alternatives, and <br />re!ocation practices and costs. <br /> <br />Establish federal and state funding mechan- <br />isms for implementation of hot water and/ <br />or steam district heating systems. Sug- <br />gested financing options include a state <br />capital grant matching program with direct <br />grants to cities; a state bond program <br />to provide loans of 100% of the capital <br />cost; and broadening the availabilty of <br />revenue bonds for these purposes. <br /> <br />Continue the ongoing fuel assistance pro- <br />gram for Iow income households and to <br />identify methods of support which would <br />include a maintenance of effort on the <br />part of the recipient. <br /> <br />Establish weatherization programs for Iow <br />income households. Permit labor costs, <br />as well as materials, to be at a realistic <br />level for Iow income weatherization pro- <br />grams, with counties, cities and GAP <br />agencies as designated recipients. <br /> <br />Energy conservation <br /> <br /> Cities will be adopting an overall energy con- <br />servation plan to accomplish prioritization of <br />conservation efforts through the public, private, <br />commercial and industrial sectors. The plan will be <br />based on the rationale that conservation efforts <br />achieve the greatest energy savings at the lowest <br />cost. The League believes that a city's individual <br />energy conservation plan can be accomplished if <br />the legislature permits or establishes some of the <br />following measures: <br /> <br />Make the energy code mandatory state- <br />wide with enforcement as follows. Any <br />building or improvement to which the <br />energy code applies shall be designed to <br />conform to it by an architect, engineer <br />or contractor who shall also inspect the <br />building and certify to the city, or county <br />if located outside of a city, that the build- <br />ing or improvement has been constructed <br />in compliance with the energy code. If <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Continue the availability of MHFA and <br />other funds-to finance grants and Iow <br />interest loans for weatherization pro- <br />grams. <br /> <br />Support increasing tax incentives for re- <br />sidential weatherization. <br /> <br />Provide financial support for residential <br />energy audit programs coordinated at <br />the local level. <br /> <br />Establish an Energy Bank Trust Fund to <br />finance energy cost-effective programs at <br />the local level. This fund should be a de- <br />signated block grant to cities for imple- <br />mentation of residential conservation mea- <br />sures, capital grants, and local conserva- <br />tion and energy codes and energy code en- <br />forcement. <br /> <br />.Support incentives for gasohol production, <br />including promoting gasohol usage by <br /> <br />- 24 - <br /> <br /> <br />