My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/27/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 05/27/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:19:21 PM
Creation date
9/8/2004 8:49:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/27/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
stale and city owned vehicles and expe- <br />diting the federal and state regulatory <br />process regarding the manufacture of gas- <br />ohol. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />Support the establishment of a system <br />of energy exchanges within the state, <br />building on the indigenous renewable <br />resources of local areas which are linked <br />to markets for agricultural fuel products <br />in adjoining urban areas. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />Support additional funding to local govern- <br />merits for mini and maxi-audits and imple- <br />mentation of energy conservation mea- <br />sures. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />Support incentives to hasten the use of <br />renewable resources. Special emphasis <br />should be' placed on investment in re- <br />sources appropriate to the local com- <br />munity. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />Give municipalities the option of enacting <br />and enforcing more stringent codes, other <br />than the building code, for purposes of <br />energy conservation. <br /> <br />Planning grant program <br /> <br /> The state matching grant program which pro- <br />vides funds to increase the local planning capa- <br />city of cities and counties should be continued by <br />the legislature, recognizing that planning is an <br />ongoing process. The League recommends that <br />these funds be available to cities and counties for <br />establishing and for continuing existing pla. n- <br />ning programs. The legislation should reflect a <br />higher priority for agricultural land preservation. <br /> <br />Environmental impact statement process <br /> <br /> The rules and regulations which have been a- <br />dopted by the Environmental Quality Council gov- <br />erning the environmental impact statement pro- <br />cess have gone a long way toward integrating <br />this process into the pre-existing legal procedural <br />framework in local units of government. The <br />result has been to reinforce the traditional role <br />of local government in land use and related decis- <br />ions which are primarily of local concern. Further- <br />more, the assignment of a major portion of the <br />financial responsibility for the preparation of any <br />necessary environmental impact statement to the <br />party initiating the new development, relieves <br />local government of what could be a significant <br />financing burden. Nonetheless, there may be cir- <br /> <br />cumstances where it would be in the public interest <br />to have an environmental impact study conducted <br />which could not or should not be assumed by the <br />party initiating the new development. Therefore, <br />the League recommends that cities continue to <br />be permitted' to undertake such a study with their <br />own resources. Furthermore, the petition pro- <br />cedure should be revised to provide that only <br />registered voters who are residents of the affected <br />area, may sign petitions requesting the preparation <br />of an environmental impact statement. <br /> <br />Flexible approach to pollution control <br /> <br /> The present federal and state programs for the <br />abatement of pollution problems tend to rely hea- <br />vily or exclusively upon single solution approaches <br />which are not necessarily appropriate or economi- <br />cally feasible in very small communities. As a <br />result, small cities may be required to install very <br />costly central collection and treatment systems <br />without regard to cost]benefit considerations or <br />their ability to finance the continuing operation of <br />such systems, and larger cities are discouraged from <br />using alternative strategies where they might be <br />appropriate. Consequently, the League recom- <br />mends that both federal and state pollution control <br />programs be modified to permit Iow interest loans <br />and grants to upgrade alternative environmentally <br />sound systems and to finance other means of on- <br />site disposal of domestic and commercial wastes <br />in small cities. The League encourages mandatory <br />standards for individual on-site disposal systems. <br /> <br />Intergovernmental strategies <br /> <br /> During the last several years, the Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agenc2y has taken several steps <br />which have markedly improved, the working <br />relationship between its own staff and local govern- <br />ment officials. The decentralization of its staff <br />in regional offices, the increasing willingness to <br />provide technical assistance to local governments <br />and the appointment of an advisory council <br />composed of local government officials, have each <br />contributed to better communication and coopera- <br />tion. The League endorses these efforts and urges <br />the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to con- <br />tinue to involve local officials in the mutual <br />effort to improve the effectiveness of our efforts <br />to preserve and improve our enfironment, and <br />encourages all other state agencies to do the <br />same thing. <br /> <br />Lake improvement and restoration <br /> <br />Cities, towns and counties now have consider- <br /> <br />- 25 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.