Laserfiche WebLink
EVALUATION PROCEDURE <br /> <br />All the potential travel corridors from each CBD were <br />considered in the evaluation. Corridors to serve Subregion 4 and 12 <br />were not considered eligible according to the policy plan since they <br />are not contiguous to either~of the Metro Center Subregions. The <br />corridors are listed in Table 1. - <br /> <br />Table 1. Corridors of.Major Travel Demand <br /> <br />CBD <br />Related <br /> <br />Corridor <br />Identification <br /> <br />Description <br /> <br />Minneapolis East <br /> <br />" " " Southeast <br /> <br />" " " South <br />" " " Southwest <br /> <br />" " " West <br />" " " Northwest <br />" " " North <br />" " " Northeast <br /> <br />St. Paul West <br /> <br />"" " North <br /> <br />1-94, Univ Ave CMSTP & P <br />RR, BN RR <br />TH55 (Hiawatha) Minnehaha, <br />CMST. P & BN RR <br />1-35W,Cedar,MN & S RR <br />TH7,TH169,/212,CNW RR,'BN- ' __ <br />RR <br />TH12 ,TH55, CNW RR,BN RR <br />1-94,TH52,SooL RR <br />1-94, TH65, TH47, BN RR <br />1-35W,TH65,TH47,BN RR <br /> <br />1-94',Univ Ave,CMST~P & P <br />RR <br />1-35E,TH10,SooL RR <br /> <br />" " " Northeast <br />" " " East <br />" " " Southeast <br />" " " South <br />" " " Sou thwe s t <br /> <br />TH36,TH61 ,SooL RR <br />1-94,CNW RR <br />TH61, BN RR <br />TH3,TH55,CRI & PRR <br />1-35E,Pleasant, <br />W.7th,CMST.P & P RR <br /> <br />The evaluation process is a three step evaluation procedure. The <br />advantage of the procedure is that each corridor is given an equal <br />chance for selection until it becomes apparent that it does not have <br />the most desirable attributes. <br />The first, second and third cut criteria are applied sequentially. <br />That is, a corridor must meet the criteria in the first cut before it <br />is analyzed using the second cut and third cut criteria. <br /> <br />The evaluation technique specifies that if ~ corridor is determined <br />to be viable for a subsequent evaluation after it passes a cut, <br />that it has equal status with all other corridors which pass the <br />cut. For example if a corridor ranks high enough to be eligible for <br />the third cut evaluation, its numerical or relative rank in the <br />second cut evaluation is of no consequence. All corridors being <br />considered for the third cut evaluation are equally qualified. <br /> <br />The benefit of the proposed evaluation procedure is that the group <br />making the decision can consider both numerical and subjective <br />factors. The data used in the procedure are only indications of how <br />a given corridor selection would conform to the desired basic <br />criteria. <br /> <br /> <br />