My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/08/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 07/08/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:04:29 PM
Creation date
9/9/2004 2:43:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/08/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FIRST CUT CRITERIA <br /> <br />The First Cut Criteria are used to define the corridors in relation <br />to existing regional transit policies and travel sheds of movement. <br /> <br />The criteria are: <br /> <br />The corridor must serve both of the Metro Centers or one Metro <br />Center and a Suburban Subregion. <br /> <br />The travel shed of a corridor is the area of trip attraction to a <br />route using minimum time paths to the CBD. The area is adjusted <br />to reflect probable transit operations. <br /> <br />Cm <br /> <br />The travel shed of a. corridor may also be defined along a major <br />travel desire line to the CBD. <br /> <br />The corridor may not extend beyond the MUSA boundary and the <br />will terminate at least three 'miles inside the MUSA'boundaryo <br /> <br />Application of Criterion A above resulted in combining some of'the <br />original corridors to represent the travel connection between a Metro- <br />Center and a Suburban Subregion. - <br /> <br />The corridors resulting from the first cut criteria evaluation are <br />listed in Table 2 and shown on Figure 1. <br /> <br />Table 2. First Cut Transit Corridors <br /> <br />CBD Related <br /> <br />Subregion Served <br /> <br />Corrido~ Identification <br /> <br />A. Mpls. 1 East <br />B. " " " 11 Southeast <br />C. " " " 3 South <br />D. " " " 5 West/Southwest <br />E. " " " 6 Northwest <br />F. " " " 8 Northeast <br />G. " " " 7 North <br /> <br />A. St. Paul 2 <br />H. " " " 9 <br />I. " " " 10 <br />J. " " " 1 1 <br /> <br />West <br />North/Northeast <br />East/Southeast <br />South/Southwest <br /> <br />It is apparent in comparing Table I with Table 2 that the Minneapolis <br />corridor labelled Southwest and the St. Paul corridors labelled <br />North, Southeast, and Southwest were combined with other corridors <br />and not deleted from further evaluation. Rather than eliminate <br />corridors, the evaluation indicated that some of the originally <br />identified corridors served the same Suburban Subregion and, <br />therefore, were combined. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.