Laserfiche WebLink
II. GENERAL BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The history of solid waste disposal in the Twin Cities Metropolitan <br />Area has been characterized by such practices as open dumping and <br />open burning, and more recently, the more closely regulated practices <br />of incineration and landfilling. However, as the volumes of solid <br />wastes increase, as new environmental restrictions go into effect and <br />the availability of satisfactory sites for land disposal diminishes, <br />these waste management practices are becoming less attractive, less <br />acceptable and less convenient. <br /> <br />The need for new approaches, accelerated by recent shortages of <br />energy and material resources, have led many communities to consider <br />alternative and new solid waste management practices, including waste <br />reduction, source separation and resource recovery. Nevertheless, <br />consideration of such practices is presenting community decision- <br />makers with a new set of complex technical, economic and social <br />issues that must be resolved. <br /> <br />Reasonable solid waste management decisions require a mechanism that <br />responds to the complex, potentially conflicting, multi-jurisdic- <br />tional issues involved. Recognizing this, the Minnesota Legislature <br />passed the State Waste Management Act in April 1980, with the goal of <br />improving solid waste management practices in the state. One respon- <br />sibility delegated to the Metropolitan Council is to prepare and <br />submit a land disposal abatement report by January 1, 1981, to the <br />seven metropolitan counties on the potential for abating the need for <br />and practice of land disposal of mixed municipal solid waste in the <br />Metropolitan Area. The report is to recommend priorities and <br />objectives for abating the land disposal of solid waste. <br /> <br />The land disposal abatement report is to be used by the counties <br />in developing land disposal abatement plans, due by April 1, 1982. <br />The Council, in turn, reviews the proposals and amends its regional <br />solid waste policy plan to include specific and quantifiable <br />objectives for abating land disposal. The counties must implement <br />the Council's abatement plan by June 1, 1983, in part, through <br />amendment of their solid waste master plans. <br /> <br />Pursuant to the Waste Management Act', the report must contain an <br />analysis of abatement achievable through waste reduction, waste <br />separation, waste processing and resource recovery. The analysis <br />must include specific and quantifiable abatement objectives and <br />degrees of abatement; and must identify the solid waste managemept <br />methods and technologies, private and governmental actions, faci- <br />lities and services, development schedules, revenue-raising methods, <br />and the levels of public and private expenditure and effort necessary <br />to achieve the objectives and degrees of abatement. <br /> <br />The Council is also required to encourage public debate on the issues <br />relating to land disposal abatement and to hold at least one public <br />meeting on the issues in each of the seven counties. This require- <br />ment will be fulfilled by the Council in several ways. First, this <br />issues document is to be presented to the public to encourage public <br />debate of the alternative land abatement disposal strategies and to <br />solicit comments on specific issues and the Council's scope of work <br /> <br /> <br />