Laserfiche WebLink
- 13 - <br /> <br />economics of sorting and removing contaminants from recyclable <br />materials. A residential source separation program in Marblehead, <br />Massachussetts, is currently recovering 25 percent of the solid <br />waste stream (EPA, 1979). Similar well-run programs can bare the <br />same results in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The recovery <br />rate in the Twin Cities with mandatory source separation could <br />potentially reach 33 percent recovery, since Marblehead's pro- <br />gram did not estimate commercial recovery of corrugated material <br />or beverage containers, recovery of tires through recapping, tex- <br />tile recovery, aluminum buy-back programs, and plastic recycling. <br />Corrugated recovery in the Twin Cities during 1979 was at 70 per- <br />cent of the potential supply, which amounts to seven percent of <br />the total waste stream (John Walton, Champion International). <br />Recovery rate results for the Marblehead program were as follows: <br /> <br />newsprint <br />corrugated <br />ferrous <br />aluminum <br /> <br />67.0 percent <br />6.6 percent <br />39.0 percent <br />0.3 percent <br /> <br />clear glass <br />green glass <br />brown glass <br /> <br />61.0 percent <br />55.0 percent <br />39.0 percent <br /> <br />Improving Marblehead's 25 percent total recovery rate into a 33 <br />percent recovery rate is also feasible through improved residen- <br />tial curb-side collection methods. For example, Boca Raton, <br />Florida, recovers 82 percent of all generated newsprint (MPCA, <br />unpub, data). Establishment of container deposit legislation can <br />also improve upon the 25 percent recovery rate for the solid waste <br />stream. Marblehead's program recovers 43.4 percent of all ferrous <br />beverage containers (EPA, 1979). 5everage container deposits <br />usually recover ferrous and nonferrous beverage containers at a <br />rate of over 90 percent. Vermont's deposit law has achieved a 97 <br />percent return rate (Vermont Agency of Environmental <br />Conservation, 1977). <br /> <br />C. WASTE PROCESSING <br /> <br />Waste processing, for purposes of this report, is~defined as volume <br />reduction techniques that are employed prior to landfilling, with or <br />without materials recovery systems. <br /> <br />1. SHREDDING <br /> <br />Shredding is a solid waste volume reduction technique that con- <br />sists of milling the wastes~to reduce waste constituents to <br />smaller, more uniformly sized particles. <br /> <br />A shredding operation normally consists of a shredding unit, a <br />transport network and the shredfill (landfill accepting shredded <br />wastes). Several types of shredding devices are used, including <br />vertical and horizontal axis hammer mills, vertical axis grinders <br />and horizontal axis impactors. These shredders also usually <br />include a variety of conveyors for waste routing scales, truck <br />loading and unloading platforms and storage bins or areas. <br /> <br />In the shredding process, solid wastes are milled to produce <br />uniform particle sizes on the order of two to four inches in <br />diameter. Waste size reduction results in up to 30 percent <br /> <br /> <br />