My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:06:42 PM
Creation date
9/10/2004 12:42:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/14/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 14 - <br /> <br />De <br /> <br />greater in-place waste density at the shredfill site. On a site- <br />specific basis, daily cover may not be required, since litter and <br />pathogen problems are reduced. Decreased settlement and improved <br />operation during cold and wet weather have also been noted. <br /> <br />2. BALING <br /> <br />Baling is a solid waste volume reduction technique that consists <br />of compacting solid wastes into high-density (approximately 1,800 <br />lbs. per cubic yard), rectangular-shaped bales. <br /> <br />An on-site solid waste baling operation includes a baling plant <br />and a specially designed balefill (landfill accepting baled <br />wastes). Alternatively, the baling plant may be located, at a <br />large-quantity source of solid waste or at a waste collection and <br />collection point. <br /> <br />The basic advantages of the process increases arere~uctions in <br />required landfill volume, ease ~f waste transport and placement, <br />litter reduction, decreased settlement and reduced reauirements <br />for cover material. A potential disadvantage is that the com- <br />pacting process slows the decomposition process, thus potentially <br />extending the period of time during which the landfill will con- <br />tinue to generate gas and leachate. Accordingly, the conditions <br />that favor this alternative are in areas in which there is a <br />shortage of landfill sites, thus requiring maximum utilization of <br />available land. <br /> <br />There is currently a study underway by the EPA to determine the <br />relative environmental advantages of balefill sites over con- <br />ventional landfills. This information is not available in final <br />form at this time. <br /> <br />3. PRELI~INARY CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Research on shredding technologies has increased in the past few <br />years. Preliminary indications are that shredding is a viable <br />means of reducing landfill space requirements through volume <br />reduction and elimination of cover requirements. Based <br />increased density alone, without considering potential materials <br />recovery, shredding has the potential to reduce landfill needs by <br />up to 30 percent. <br /> <br /> Results from environmental studies on relative impacts of <br /> balefills versus conventional landfills are not as conclusive as <br /> shredding research. Until more environmental data is available, <br /> it would be premature to recommend a baling system for the <br /> Metropolitan Area as a means to reduce added landfill needs. <br />RESOURCE RECOVERY <br /> <br />The types of resource recovery methods discussed in this section <br />include recovery of heat energy, biological treatment and recovery, <br />and tree waste recovery. Even though waste separation involves the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.