Laserfiche WebLink
only concern with the request was that he has not received a list of full engineering comments. <br /> He hoped to receive this list prior to his application being considered by the City Council. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reported the city engineer review memo would be <br /> provided to the applicant prior to the City Council meeting. <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked if the architecture of the building had changed since November. <br /> Mr. Schultz reviewed the architectural plans for the self-storage building with the Commission <br /> and noted only minor changes have been made to the plans. <br /> Chairperson Bauer requested further information on how the site will be accessed. <br /> Mr. Schultz reported the property would have full access from Ramsey Boulevard. <br /> William Thomas, 14716 Limonite Street NW, questioned what would happen to Lot 2. <br /> Mr. Schultz explained the plan was to have Lot 2 remain as is until it was purchased for <br /> commercial development. He noted the ponding and some tree cleanup may occur, along with <br /> some grading. <br /> Mr. Thomas expressed concern with the noise and light pollution that would come from this lot <br /> after trees were removed from the lot and questioned how the applicant would address this <br /> concern. <br /> City Planner Anderson commented he was unaware of the tree clearing the applicant was <br /> proposing and this matter would have to be addressed with the applicant. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to close the public <br /> hearing. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, VanScoy, Brauer, <br /> Nosan, and Surma. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 7:29 p.m. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Commissioner Anderson understood the concerns being raised by the resident regarding the <br /> trees. He indicated Lot 2 had a thick line of trees and he opposed these being removed. He <br /> stated he could support the scrub trees being removed but recommended no significant trees be <br /> removed until the site was ready for development. <br /> Planning Commission/February 2, 2017 <br /> Page 3 of 10 <br />