Laserfiche WebLink
Highest and Best Use —As Improved <br /> The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition (Appraisal Institute, Chicago, 2010) defines <br /> highest and best use of the property as improved as: <br /> The use that should be made of a property as it exists. An existing <br /> improvement should be renovated or retained as is so long as it continues <br /> to contribute to the total market value of the property, or until the return <br /> from a new improvement would more than offset the cost of demolishing <br /> the existing building and constructing a new one. <br /> In analyzing the Highest and Best Use of a property as improved, it is recognized that the <br /> improvements should continue to be used until it is financially advantageous to alter physical <br /> elements of the structure or to demolish it and build a new one. <br /> Physically Possible <br /> The subject improvements were constructed in 2003. In the "as-is" condition, the property is <br /> configured for gas station and car wash use, with a small retail/restaurant component. However, <br /> as discussed earlier, the access to the subject (right-in, right-out only from both northbound <br /> Highway 10 and southbound Sunfish Lake Boulevard), significantly impacts the possible uses of <br /> the subject. It would be physically possible to remove the subject's canopy and underground fuel <br /> tanks, and to convert the car wash space and demise the interior of the c-store space to <br /> accommodate a general retail use. This would result in a use similar to the adjacent retail center <br /> to the west of the subject, which shares the same access as the subject. <br /> Legally Permissible <br /> As described in the Zoning Analysis section of this report, the subject site is zoned H1 - Highway <br /> 10 Business District.The site is improved with an existing gas station/retail building. In the Zoning <br /> section of this appraisal, we determined that the existing improvements represent a legal <br /> nonconforming use. Again, permitted uses within this district include various non-traffic <br /> intensive commercial uses. Given the interim nature of this zoning district, new development on <br /> the subject site, if it were vacant, would likely be limited. However, as discussed in our <br /> Hypothetical Condition, we are envoking the Scope of the Project Rule, and are therefore <br /> considering the potential legally permissible uses of the subject outside of the proposed project. <br /> Based on our analysis of the zoning code, it appears that the desired uses include commercial <br /> uses that minimize traffic and access. This is already a limitation posed to the subject property <br /> given its existing access configuration. <br /> 54 <br />