My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/11/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 04/11/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:31:41 PM
Creation date
4/10/2017 9:28:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
754
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Financially Feasible <br /> The subject property had reportedly been successfully occupied and operated as a gas <br /> station/fast food restaurant until the road improvement project along Highway 10 and Sunfish <br /> Lake Boulevard (circa 2007/2008) changed the access to right-in, right-out only from northbound <br /> Highway 10 and southbound Sunfish Lake Boulevard. After that road project, the property <br /> continued to operate at lower levels than historically had been achieved, but was eventually <br /> vacated. This included both the gas station as well as the restaurant space which had originally <br /> been a Taco Johns but was subsequently converted to an off-brand "Taco Pulco" restaurant. The <br /> property was marketed for a couple years by Calhoun Companies as an operating gas <br /> station/restaurant property for$1,495,000, but was not sold. Approximatley 6 months ago, the <br /> property was listed with another broker who listed the property for $695,000. Our interview <br /> with the listing broker revealed that he had presented the listing to numerous gas station <br /> owner/operators, none of whom were interested in the subject given the access issue. <br /> Based on our market analysis and market participant interviews, it is our conclusion that there <br /> are two financially feasible uses for the subject in our analysis: demolish the site and re-develop <br /> with an alternative use, or to renovate the existing improvements into a general retail use. <br /> Maximally Productive <br /> In the previous analysis, we determined that both demolishing the improvements and <br /> redeveloping the site as well as renovating the existing improvements to a general retail use <br /> would be financially feasible. In order to determine which would be the maximally productive, <br /> we consider our land value conclusion and our "as-is" market value conclusion for the subject <br /> both concluded in this appraisal. The conclusions show that there is some residual value to the <br /> existing improvements above and beyond the land value, particularly when factoring in potential <br /> razing costs for demolishing the entire improvements and redeveloping the site. As a result, it is <br /> our conclusion that the maximally productive use is to renovate the existing improvements into <br /> a general retail use. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> It is our opinion that the existing improvements add value to the site as though vacant. It is our <br /> opinion that immediate renovation to general retail use is maximally productive and therefore <br /> the highest and best use of the site as improved. <br /> MOST PROBABLE BUYER <br /> Taking into account the size and class of the property, as well as its projected occupancy, the <br /> likely buyer is a local owner-user (full or partial) or investor. <br /> 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.