Laserfiche WebLink
City of Ramsey <br /> Project B1610732 <br /> January 10, 2017 <br /> Page 16 <br /> was detected in seven of the soils sample at concentrations ranging from 4 to 70 milligrams per kilogram <br /> (mg/kg). A petroleum tank release was reported to the State (Leak#14284). Contaminated soil was not <br /> excavated and stockpiled during lift removal activities since the samples did not indicated headspace <br /> readings exceeding 10 ppm. Approximately two cubic yards of soil became contaminated during the <br /> removal of the lifts. The contaminated soil was excavated and stockpiled on plastic. It was requested to <br /> thinspread the contaminated soil on-site beneath a parking or drive area.The footings for the existing <br /> building that were located in the area of past releases were screened with a PID. No elevated PID <br /> readings were noted. <br /> A 2000 Supplemental Phase II Investigation Report was prepared that discussed the investigation of <br /> potential soil and groundwater impacts from the underground hydraulic hoists. Six test holes were <br /> advanced near the underground hydraulic hoists. No elevated PID headspace measurements were <br /> recorded in any of the soil samples collected. No impacts were detected in selected soil samples. <br /> Groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for DRO and VOCs from three of the test holes. <br /> No VOCs were detected above the laboratory reporting limits in any of the samples. DRO was detected <br /> at a concentration of 500 micrograms/liter(ug/1) in one sample (collected from the Site); DRO was not <br /> detected above the laboratory reporting limit in the other two groundwater samples. <br /> The Phase II report concluded that soil impacts above the water table had been removed in the areas of <br /> the previously identified releases. A minimal amount of relatively low level petroleum contaminated soil <br /> is present beneath the former unused motor oil UST(on the Site). Groundwater impacts were found to <br /> consist mainly of low level petroleum related compounds. All of the contaminants were below their <br /> respective HRLs at the time the files were closed by the MPCA. The Phase II report states, "Based on the <br /> historical water samples and the low to non-detect results of the recently completed test holes, no <br /> further investigation or cleanup of groundwater appears necessary". <br /> A Development Response Action Plan (DRAP)was prepared and approved by the MPCA on June 4, 2001 <br /> to properly address any contamination that might be encountered during demolition of the automobile <br /> dealership building in the areas of the west drainfield,the east drainfield (on the Site), the former south <br /> dispensing island (on the Site), and the hydraulic lifts (eight of the lifts were located on the Site). An <br /> Implementation of the DRAP letter was prepared on November 30, 2001 that discussed the soil screening <br /> procedures used during the sub-grade redevelopment work.The water well associated with the former <br /> auto dealership was abandoned on May 25, 2001. DRO was detected during the removal of the hydraulic <br /> vehicle hoists within the dealership garage (Leak#14284),though at low concentrations that did not <br /> require soil removal or other response actions.The larger property, including the Site, entered into the <br /> VIC Program in April 2001 as VP4771 for the purpose of obtaining liability assurance letters regarding the <br /> historical releases identified at the larger property. Based on review of the environmental documents, <br /> the MPCA issued a Lender No Association Determination letter and a Retroactive No Association <br /> Determination letter both dated March 15, 2002.The Identified Release for the No Association letters <br /> was defined as petroleum-related VOCs and DRO impacted soils. <br /> BRAUN <br /> INTERTEC <br />