My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council - 04/25/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:32:02 PM
Creation date
4/25/2017 2:48:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/25/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
838
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
transportation system. The Council is responsible for regional transportation planning, including bicycle <br /> transportation facilities. Since regional trails also serve commuters, it is important that the Regional <br /> Parks System and the transportation system work together when developing trail and transportation <br /> plans. <br /> A comprehensive network of trails that serve both recreation and transportation needs is desirable. This <br /> network should link state, regional, county and local trails, and should be integrated with other <br /> transportation modes, including the transit system. <br /> Regional trails are primarily multi-use recreation trails, although some regional trails also serve bicycle <br /> commuter functions. The majority of regional trail miles should be developed so they are off or away <br /> from roadways. However, in some instances it may be necessary for a short stretch of trail, to be <br /> adjacent to or on a road in order to bypass natural or man-made barriers or private property. <br /> Regional trails will primarily consist of these types of facilities: <br /> • Off-road facilities, which are paths within or adjacent to the road rights-of-way but separated from <br /> the roadway surface. They may be used for walking and inline skating as well as bicycling. <br /> • Independent trails, such as trails using abandoned railroad corridors or utility easements that exist <br /> in their own independent rights-of-way. <br /> In addition to pedestrians and inline skaters, regional trails are intended to serve: <br /> • Casual or new adult and teenage bicyclists who prefer comfortable access, preferably by a <br /> direct route on low-speed or low-traffic streets. These bicyclists are most comfortable on <br /> designated bikeways, off-road facilities and independent trails, or having access to streets with <br /> low vehicle speeds and volumes. <br /> • Pre-teen bicyclists whose roadway use is usually accompanied by a parent. They need access <br /> to local schools, libraries, recreation facilities, shopping, or other residential areas. These <br /> bicyclists have a strong preference for separation of bicycles from motor vehicles through off- <br /> road facilities or independent trails. <br /> Regional trails may also serve the most experienced bicyclists, who want direct access to destinations <br /> at maximum speed with minimum delays. Highly experienced bicyclists primarily rely on the road <br /> system for routes, and value using roads like other vehicles for commuting, but occasionally enjoy <br /> independent trails if they are relatively continuous and not overly crowded. <br /> Regional Bicycle Transportation Network <br /> In preparing the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan, the Council conducted a Regional Bicycle System <br /> Study in 2013-2014. The purpose of the study was to develop a more complete understanding of how <br /> the region's on-street bikeways and off-road trails interact and how they serve regional transportation <br /> trips by bicycle. The primary outcome of the study was to identify a Regional Bicycle Transportation <br /> Network, which defined a two-tiered network for planning and implementation. The Tier 1 (high priority) <br /> network was identified where bicycle travel was greatest, population and job densities were highest, <br /> and where there were the most opportunities to connect regional job concentrations and activity centers <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.