Laserfiche WebLink
That the Applicant is requesting a variance from the 20-foot pavement setback requirement <br />along Highway 10 in order to install the required curbing and a bkuminous sur~ce within 5 <br />feet of the prope~W line. <br /> <br />That the Applicant has provided a site plan that identifi~s a parking lot depth of <br />approximately sixty-one (6!) feet between the front of the office building and the existing <br />chain link fence along the front property line. <br /> <br />I0. <br /> <br />That the Applicant has stated that combination of the location of the sales office and the <br />requirement ~br a 20 foot setback from front property line results in a vehicle sales and <br />customer parking area with a depth of 40 feet, which is not sufficient as there also needs to be <br />a drive aisle between the customer parking area next to the building and the vehicles <br />displayed in the front yard: <br /> <br />11. That the Applicant has stated the variance requested is the minimum variance needed to <br /> alleviate the hardship. <br /> <br />!2. That if granted, the variance will/will not permit a use that is prohibited in the B-2 Highway <br /> Business District. <br /> <br />13. That if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to <br /> adjacent property. <br /> <br />i4. That ii' granted, the variance will/will not endanger the public safety. <br /> <br />!5. That if granted, the variance will/will not unreasonably diminish property values in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> <br />16. That if granted, the variance will/will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />17. That, if granted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicants any special privileges that are <br /> denied ~o other owners of land in the same district. <br /> <br />That undue hardship will/will not result if the variance request is denied due to the existence <br />of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land and which are not <br />applicable to other lands in the same district. <br /> <br />19. That the special conditions do/do not result from the actions of the Applicant. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the tbregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner __ <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following woted against: <br /> <br />and the l%[lowing abstained: <br /> <br />Pd);SOL UTI ON #04-10- <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />