Laserfiche WebLink
lour 1111.1siion: To work together to reiposihty grow our community, and to provide quality, coat -effective, and efficient government ierrlcas. <br />CC Regular Session 7. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 05/09/2017 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Easement Vacations, Final Plat, and Development Agreement for Brookfield 8th Addition (Project No. <br />16-78); Case of Brookfield Land, LLC <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider multiple actions related to Brookfield 8th Addition, a twenty-five (25) lot, <br />single family residential subdivision proposed by Brookfield Land LLC (the "Applicant") on Outlot A, Brookfield <br />2nd Addition and PID #09-32-25-44-0017 (together, the "Subject Property"). Requested actions include vacating <br />existing drainage and utility easements and a temporary trail easement, approval of the Final Plat, and approval of <br />multiple agreements. <br />The Applicant has proposed vacating an existing trail easement that runs generally along the location of the <br />proposed roadway extension of 168th Circle NW and across the proposed lots 10, 11, and 12 of Block 2. The <br />proposed improvements in connection with the development would result in a sidewalk along the north/west side of <br />168th Circle NW and a new trail access to the existing Trott Brook Trail. The existing trail easement was put into <br />place as a temporary means to provide local residents access to the Trott Brook Trail. This development will <br />establish a permanent trail access. The Applicant has also proposed to vacate an existing ten (10) foot drainage and <br />utility easement that runs along the southern property line of Outlot A, Brookfield 2nd Addition. Note - the Public <br />Hearing Notice did create some confusion from recipients of the letter that the trail was going away all together. <br />Staff has been able to clarify as needed, and mailed a clarifying letter on January 22. <br />The Applicant has received previous approvals for this project from the City Council including submission of a <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re -guide a portion of the Subject Property from Rural Developing to Low <br />Density Residential, rezoning a portion of the Subject Property from R-1 Residential (Rural Developing) to R-1 <br />Residential (MUSA) and Preliminary Plat. Additionally, the Applicant had also received a variance to cul-de-sac <br />length, front yard setback, and lot depth standards by the Planning Commission. <br />This case was originally considered by the City Council at its February 28, 2017 regular meeting. At that meeting, <br />the City Council did close the Public Hearing on the easement vacations. However, action on the various requests <br />was tabled until the Metropolitan Council took action on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request and there <br />was resolution to the request for the City to participate in a cost -sharing of the extension of the watermain line <br />south to 166th Ave. <br />Notification: <br />