Laserfiche WebLink
Staff attempted to notify all Property Owners within a 700 foot radius of the Subject Property of the Public Hearing <br />via Standard US Mail. The Public Hearing was also published in the City's official newsletter, the Anoka County <br />Union Herald. A second letter was also sent out the same mailing list to clarify the requested vacation of the <br />temporary trail easement was not eliminating the public access to the Trott Brook Trail, but that a new, permanent <br />connection would be provided as part of this project. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />On April26, 2017, the Metropolitan Council did approve the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment without <br />any contingencies. However, their approval came with a strong recommendation that the wetlands and stormwater <br />ponds be platted as publicly owned outlots to provide better protection of the ecological resources on the Subject <br />Property. Staff is working with the Applicant on the idea of a wetland and stormwater protection easement that <br />would encumber these areas rather than creating separate outlots for these lands. This would not have any impact <br />on the proposed configuration of the plat yet still would seem to meet the intent of the Metropolitan Council's <br />recommendation for better ecological resource protection. Furthermore, if some sort of physical marker were <br />installed along the easement boundary, this would assist even more in reducing potential encroachment issues <br />and;/or vegetative alterations. <br />Watermain Extension <br />The Public Works Committee reviewed the request for a cost -share agreement to complete a loop of the proposed <br />watermain line down to 166th Ave NW. The Applicant's Engineer's Estimate for this loop is $96,562.50. The Public <br />Works Committee unanimously recommended that the City participate in fifty-fifty (50-50) cost -share with a not to <br />exceed cap of $50,000 for the City's contribution. The Public Works Committee case is attached for reference and <br />for more specific details. The Development Agreement has been revised to address the City's participation in the <br />cost -share to complete this looping with a not -to -exceed cap of $50,000. <br />Easement Vacations <br />The City Council conducted a Public Hearing to consider the vacation of existing drainage and utility easements on <br />Outlot A Brookfield 2nd Addition (to be rededicated with the recording of the Final Plat of Brookfield 8th <br />Addition) and the vacation of an existing, temporary trail easement (to be replaced with a new, permanent trail <br />easement as part of Brookfield 8th Addition). The City Council closed the Public Hearing at its meeting on <br />February 28, 2017, after there were no public comments provided. However, action is still needed to formally <br />vacate these easements. <br />Oak Wilt Management Plan <br />The Applicant intends to complete the tree clearing and initial grading work in advance of the street and utility <br />work. Their intention had been to complete this work prior to April 15 to avoid the 'high risk' timeframe for <br />transmission of oak wilt. However, with the delayed action on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request, their <br />time table has been pushed back. As a result, the Applicant worked with a Certified Arborist to develop an Oak Wilt <br />Management Plan to outline the preventative steps that would be taken to minimize the potential introduction of oak <br />wilt to the site or surrounding areas. Considering that there is a pocket of oak wilt on the Subject Property, the <br />proposed Management Plan will actually be more effective in controlling the spread of oak wilt than would waiting <br />till the lower risk season (typically sometime in July). The EPB has reviewed the proposed Management Plan and <br />has recommended approval of it. <br />Final Plat <br />The Final Plat generally consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat. As previously noted, Staff is working with <br />the Applicant in an attempt to address the recommendation from the Metropolitan Council regarding enhanced <br />protection of ecological resources. This could be in the form of an easement rather than platting these areas in <br />separate outlots (as recommended by the Metropolitan Council). If the Applicant is agreeable to encumbering the <br />wetlands and stormwater ponds in a more protective easement (compared to the standard drainage and utility <br />easement), this wouldn't have any impact on the plat itself yet still seems to address the intent of the Metropolitan <br />Council's recommendation. <br />Alternatives <br />