Laserfiche WebLink
Traditional Single-Family/Small Lot Single -Family and Villa Lots <br />1A• • i•Iu ii, i <br />Attached and Detached Townhomes <br />Lot size <br />Minimum density (net) <br />Maximum density (net) <br />Lot width <br />Building setback from public street right- <br />of-way <br />Building setback from private street <br />measured from back of curb <br />Building setback from exterior <br />development boundary line <br />None <br />3.0 <br />7.0 <br />None <br />25 feet <br />25 feet <br />30 feet <br />25 feet (detached) <br />Minimum separation between buildings, <br />including any appurtenances thereto (i.e., <br />patios, decks) <br />20 feet <br />15 feet (detached) <br />Parking node setback from exterior <br />development boundary line <br />Parking node setback from structure <br />Maximum lot coverage <br />Maximum building height (measured from <br />mean ground level to mean gable) <br />Accessory structure setback (measured <br />from the development boundary line) <br />Maximum number of units per structure <br />Open space required <br />30 feet <br />15 feet <br />35% <br />35 feet <br />30 feet <br />81 (detached) <br />40% general open space 10% of which must <br />be identifiable community space <br />The only deficiency in the above table would be the minimum separation between buildings. The <br />Planning Commission and City Council have already seen this project in concept, and appeared <br />generally supportive of the overall approach. The PUD appears to be an appropriate tool in this <br />instance. <br />Continued on next page. <br />It is our mission to work together to responsibly grow our community, and to provide quality, cost-effective and efficient government <br />services. <br />Riverstone Addition Planning Division Review March 31, 2017 (Sketch Plan) <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />