My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 04/15/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2003
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 04/15/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:28:15 PM
Creation date
10/19/2004 12:35:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
04/15/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Public Works Committee discussed the different types of equipment that can be used for <br />clearing sidewalks in the winter and yet be used for other things over the summer months. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired as to how many hours it takes to clear the sidewalks within the <br />walking zone. <br /> <br />Street Supervisor Riemer replied about four hours. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Update on Feasibility Study for the Improvement of Dirt Streets <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that at the March 2003 Public Works Committee meeting, Staff <br />reported that it was preparing a feasibility study for the improvement of dirt streets. This study <br />was initiated at the direction of the City Council last fall. Several questions were raised by <br />Councilmembers at the March Public Works Committee meeting. <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />Could "Conbit" a base material made from crushed bituminous be used as one <br />option considered? <br /> <br />"Conbit" provides the same function as Class 5 and is nearly identical in price. <br />Our street department has experience using this material. Staff has no objection to <br />this material, however it is our experience that dust control would still be <br />required. <br /> <br />(2) What funding sources are available? <br /> <br />The General fund; PIR Fund (special assessment); stormwater utility (for drainage <br />elements); and MSA funds (for MSA streets only). <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />Staff promised a copy of a previous report showing that the City subsidy to <br />grading and maintaining dirt streets is similar subsidy to the annual street <br />~naintenance program. A copy of that information is attached to the case. <br /> <br />At the March meeting rough costs were mentioned by Staff regarding the cost to (a) bring roads <br />up to a well drained, gravel road, and (b) a paved road way. These costs were only given <br />verbally. Table A below presents these costs. They are based on quantities for nine dirt street <br />projects. <br /> <br />Table A <br /> <br /> Summary of Major Costs <br />for Nine Dirt Road Projects <br /> <br />Alt. (a) Streets to well drained gravel road <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/April 15, 2003 <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.