My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 04/15/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2003
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 04/15/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:28:15 PM
Creation date
10/19/2004 12:35:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
04/15/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grading <br />Culverts <br />Class 5 <br />Turf Restoration <br />Construction <br />Overhead ~ 30% <br />Total <br /> <br />$ 93,300 ( 31%) <br />$ 61,200 (21%) <br />$120,700 (40%) <br />$ 23,300 (8%) <br />$298,500 (100%) <br />$ 89,550 <br />$388,050 (58% of Alt. (b)) <br /> <br />Alt. (b) Streets to paved condition <br /> <br />Construction (a) above <br />Bituminous <br />Construction <br />Overhead 30% <br /> <br />$298,500 <br />$214,100 <br />$512,600 <br />$153,800 <br />$666,400 (172%ofAlt.(~) <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski explained that the current status of the Feasibility Study needs policy <br />direction with regard to financing. The information presented in Table A would benefit 100 <br />properties. Therefore, the average cost per unit for each element is readily apparent. A primary <br />decision is what type o f subsidy, i f a ny, should b e offered a s a n incentive for improving d irt <br />streets to a (a) well drained gravel road or (b) a paved street. If a subsidy incentive is offered, of <br />what should it consist? Some consideration might be: <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />Set a cap on the special assessment to an individual property. In staff's opinion <br />Capping special assessments at an amount sufficiently high to defend against <br />complaints from past residents who did not receive City assistance. Bison Street, <br />Hedgehog Street, Jackel Street, and 164th Lane have all been paved within the last <br />five years. <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />Provide a subsidy t o t he cost o f a 11, o r a percentage of, the bituminous paving <br />only. <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />Provide a subsidy as a percentage of the total project cost, regardless of alternative <br />aorb. <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />Provide a subsidy to the costs of driveway culverts to be financed out of the <br />stormwater utility. Staff recommended against subsidizing driveway culverts. <br />While there is a utility fund available to generate revenues for this element of the <br />p~'ogram, there are thousands of driveways in the City, most in fair to poor <br />condition. It may be difficult to defend against replacing existing damaged or <br />failing driveway culverts at City expense. <br /> <br />(5) <br /> <br />Provide a set amount of money to be divided equally among all benefited parties. <br />Staff felt that this would provide a good incentive for residents to pave or upgrade <br />their street. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/April 15, 2003 <br /> Page 7 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.