Laserfiche WebLink
permanent solution to this situation is necessary. Earlier, staffhad advised the Thorson's that the <br />problem could be addressed along with the access road from T.H. #47 into Elmcrest Park, <br />however, within the past y ear it has become apparent that the park access will follow a northerly <br />route to 167th Avenue. Staff presented three options to address this drainage issue as follows: <br /> <br />Alternative A: A flared end storm sewer would accept the runoff delivered by the culvert <br />across T.H. //47 and be transmitted across the golf course to the golf course pond. A <br />culvert would be placed across 164th Lane to reduce the amount of runoff delivered to the <br />ponding area in front of 5230 and 5810. The construction cost associated with the piping <br />for this alternative is estimated to be $31,000. In addition, however, an easement would <br />be needed from the golf course to facilitate this alternative. Depending on how close the <br />easement would be to the south golf course property line, tree loss may also be an impact. <br />Survey work would be needed to determine if there was a conflict with the gas line. <br /> <br />Alternative B: Alternative B would utilize a flared end storm sewer pipe picking up flow <br />from the T.H. #47 culvert and transmitting it south and then east along 164th Lane, to a <br />side yard easement line between 5821 and 5761, and then into the golf course pond. A <br />lead across 164th Lane would drain the secondary ponding problem as well. The <br />construction cost of this alternative was estimated to be $44,000, which included the <br />replacement of half of 164th Lane. All necessary easements for this transmission line <br />associated with this alternative are currently held by the City, however, the City Attorney <br />has advised that obtaining easements on waiver from properties boarding the pond, <br />including the golf course would be desirable, since the only portion of the pond covered <br />by the easement includes the twenty feet along the common border between 5821 and <br />5761. A temporary easement for construction would also be helpful. There would be tree <br />loss impact along the 5821 and 5761 property line, since it is heavily wooded. This <br />alternative would also allow the ponded water on 5830 and 5810 to be drained entirely. <br />Similar to Alternative A, there may be a conflict with the gas line. <br /> <br />Alternative C: The Thorson's have had a significant reduction in the use of their <br />backyard resulting from the existing drainage, and have expressed a desire for some form <br />of immediate relief. The Thorson's have considered placing a four-inch tile line across <br />their backyard. There appears to be a swale through the wooded areas flowing through <br />the rear property area of 5821 to the east and into the golf course pond. The cost of this <br />project undertaken by the Thorson's is estimated to be $500. In the Thorson's letter they <br />have requested consideration by the City in participating with the expense. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if any of the situation was being caused by the dewatering <br />activity occurring along T.H. #47. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied no. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig inqtlired if staff had any indication if the golf course would cooperate with <br />the necessary easement for alternative A. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/July 15, 2003 <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />