My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 01/03/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 01/03/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:02:41 PM
Creation date
5/5/2003 2:59:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
01/03/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan Amendment on December 18, 2001. The 2001 Comprehensive Plan <br />designates the subject property being used for Places to Shop. Edina Development is asking for <br />an amendment to the 2001 Comprehensive Plan to allow for a medium density residential project <br />on the property that would allow up to 7 units per acre. He explained that City Staff feels that <br />this is an appropriate location for multi-family residential development and therefore is <br />recommending approval of the comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use on the <br />subject property from commercial and single family uses to medium density residential uses. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Ko ciscak asked if the majority of the Council showed interest. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that all members agreed that high density was too much. A <br />couple members were interested in considering a medium density designation. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Richard Kruger at 7640 150th Lane noted that the Council is in process of considering 11 land use <br />amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. He asked if this is one of the 11. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon responded it is, though there are 13. The applicant has submitted a <br />separate application for a quicker response than waiting for the public hearing later in the month. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Sweet, to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Kociscak, Commissioners Johnson, Sweet, Reeve, and <br />Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Nixt and Commissioner Brauer. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 8:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Vice Chair Kociscak called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order at <br />8:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Watson, to recommend that the <br />City Council adopt the resolution authorizing staff to submit the Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment to Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Kociscak, Commissioners Johnson, Watson, Reeve, <br />and Sweet. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Nixt and Commissioner Brauer. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request to Rezone Property from R-1 Residential, B-1 Business and B-2 <br />Business to R-3U Multiple Residential; Case of Edina Development, Inc. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 3, 2002 <br /> Page 14 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.