Laserfiche WebLink
installing a second stop sign to re-emphasize the stop position. They have not <br />heard from the county, but have installed a temporary sign. Staff will report back <br />when they hear from the county. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec indicated he has been contacted by several people about problems with the <br />blockade on Alpine Boulevard and 153rd Avenue. There is no Stop sign on the barricade and <br />people on Alpine Drive expect drivers to stop at the barricade. He suggested a temporary stop <br />sign be placed on the county road next to the barricadel Assistant Public Works Director Olson <br />indicated staff will look into this tomorrow morning and di~:euss the. issue with the Public Works <br />Committee on Tuesday. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to direct staff~:i:fn!g~'hll a f6~ mop sign at the barricade <br />on Alpine Boulevard and 153 Avenue. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson indicated'~ ali}CuSs this Wi{~-~'/CdUn~ to be sure <br />they are in agreement with the stop sign. <br /> <br />Case ~3: Request for an Amended Conditiodhl u~e~,~e~to Eliminate the Owner- <br /> Occupancy Requirement , ' ~so~ A~¢~'~i~::Case of Kevin BloCk, <br /> Barbara Lee and Ga~ S~ <br /> <br /> Associate Planner Geisler explained <br /> applied tbr and received a <br /> Residential District. The approved C~ <br /> dwelling unit on the property, ~o?.[ong as the <br />units. Since 1994, the prope~:;WiiS sold to <br />· prospective buyer, who wisheS. ~o~ rent out both <br /> <br />15823 Nowthen Boulevard <br />apartment in the R-1 <br />p~gperty owner to rent out the second <br />maintains residence in one of the <br /> Who now wish to sell it to a <br /> plish this the original CUP must <br /> <br />be amended to delete the owner-occupa~ncy requirement. She explained the.original 'Conditional <br />. Use i ermit process began in 19.9.3: :.iafte??.~.,~uilding inspection revealed there were two dwelling <br />units in use on the Subject Proper0-.!il T~{~er at that time was notified that she needed a CUP <br /> . . . ¢. ~557~::; ~ .;.¢~{..~;: ... -,,. ....... <br />m order to operate an. accessory apartmeil~-~i~e R-1 Residential Dmtnct. A CUP was issued by <br />the City Council in 1994, wi'th~the condi{~'$~){hat the Property owner maintains residence in the <br />main dwelling unit. Since that'hme, the R-1 Residential District was amended to eliminate <br />accessory apartments as a conditional use; therefore, the accessory apartment on the Subject <br />Property is now considered lawfUl non-conforming. Presently, both the main unit and the <br />accessory unit are owner-occul~ied~ The current owners wish to sell the home to a buyer who <br />plans to rent out both units. The Subject Property is approximately 3.5 acres. <br /> <br />Associatc Planner Geisler explained since 1994, the City has made significant updates to the <br />Rental Licensing requirements ~n City Code. The City now requires a Rental License for all <br />rental properties in the City, which must be renewed every two years. The intent of the new <br />Rental Licensing requirement is to ensure that all rental housing in the City meets basic quality <br />standards. A major component of the licensing requirement is an inspection, which is conducted <br />by thc Building Department. She indicated-at the public hearing, the Planning Commission <br />heard from several ~esidents who raised concerns about the request to amend the CUP. The <br /> <br />City Council/October 12, 2004 <br /> Page 10 of 29 <br /> <br /> <br />