Laserfiche WebLink
primary concern was that to remove the owner-occupancy requirement could lead to a lack of <br />maintenance on the subject property, and degradation of the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler advised under City Code, a CUP cannot be considered by the City <br />Council until at least 14 days after the Planning Commission public hearing. Due to the need of <br />the sellers to resolve the issues, the applicant is requesting that the City Council consider waiving <br />this requirement. She indicated staff's original recommendation was supportive of the request, <br />because of the major upgrades that have been made to th~ City's rental.licensing requirements. <br />However, on a 3-2 vote, the Planning Commission re6Ommended denial of the amended <br />conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Louis Abendroth, 15810 Sodium Street, stated <br />now they have been very good neighbors, with <br />that they want to sell the place and make it'! <br />premises. If they leave this the way it is with <br />place. This property is zoned residential with a <br />residential with two apartments. The people that <br />pay rent .by the month. He stated to him the <br />Commission voted it down and said it <br />apartments there; a homeowner is more <br /> <br /> three owners. Up to <br /> in <br /> -.. ....... .:??: being off <br />they are':'apt: k~ care of the <br />Now ~fi~ ~'~nt to make it <br />do not care; they will <br />~s tal~ih~gii'~i~e~.ib~ckwards. The Planning <br />the ~ ii'i~;:~He doe~ not want two <br />and kee'~?:,f~!!~'~e in a residential area. <br /> <br />Elaine McNagal stated she lives in Pl' <br />this property. The owners have <br />like to buy it. They had no idea,~6re <br /> <br /> are the potential buyers of <br /> which is why they would <br />on the property. Her husband is a <br /> <br />carpenter and they became land:~d~.tfor the ago this March. They bought a <br />duplex that also has a condifi~r~il~:;~se .... out when we bought it.. She <br />stated a neighbor to the sidebf~S Property at the public hearing, and when he <br />found out they own the 0thei~:!~pe~ he dropped his complaint. She stated these are real <br />concerns, but ~ey do not rent?~h~2~¢~onth; most landlords do not do this. They have t~vo <br />renters in their bUiiding;' who bo~t~~d houses before they became renters. Renters do <br />the same as homeoWners.,, they reside ~11~'gare about their prope~. She explained the only <br />reason they would n0t move'h*~e is that t~i'ke the house where they live.' <br /> <br />Barbara Lee stated she is one Of:the cu~ent owners of the prope~. They sta~ed out as renters at <br />the address the prospective buyers;now own at 16000 No,hen Boulevard. She stated all renters <br />are not bad; she and her mothe~Bage been renters all their lives. <br /> <br />Lynn Ellen-stated she is an0thef owner of this p~ope~. When they purchased the house it had <br />the conditional use pemi[' The previous owner was not there, she 'was out of state for work. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec commented when this conditional use permit was passed they Wanted the owners <br />to be residents of the building because they felt it would be more secure and they would take <br />more pride in the property. He noted there is rental property i.n the City and most of it is in very <br />good shape. <br /> <br />City Council/October 12, 2004 <br /> Page 11 of 29 <br /> <br /> <br />