My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/26/2004 - 10/26/04
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 10/26/2004 - 10/26/04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:33:07 PM
Creation date
10/22/2004 11:36:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
10/26/04
Document Date
10/26/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councihnember Zimmerman commented there would be better control by leaving the controls <br />the way they are. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if someone could purchase the property and rent .out the house if <br />they were to leave the apartment un-rented. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook questioned what the advantage is t0i::~1a[e the:~.house can be purchased and <br />rented out it' the apartment is not rented. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted the concern that led to this <br />the property, and an on site owner seemed to be <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen requested staff tO <br />Commission. She inquired what the difference <br />renting out a duplex, and inquired what the thou <br />conditional use from the R-1 zoning ordinance. <br /> <br />s who would maintain <br /> <br />Of the c0~'~ii:!:~ ~he Planning <br /> her renting: ~i~t:her house to <br /> accessory apartments as a <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler explained the <br />some ~of the comments the Council <br />premises for maintenance and repair <br /> <br />· )n's concerns were along the lines of <br /> to having an owner on the <br /> <br />Community <br />eliminated from the zoning ordifi~;:prior to <br />statement in each zoning districCthb, t <br />compatible with the neighb0rk6~::i~yhat has be <br />list the uses a conditional'use:l~it'..pan be obtained for. <br /> <br />Councilmember: Strom~en:'clarified~~hs not a thought <br />accessory apartments; they wem~just not ad~3 to the hst. <br /> <br />Community Development D[m~tOLFrolik responded that is co~ect. <br />Pla~e'd that this will be discu S'ad::i:h the ~ture. <br /> <br />Development DirectOr:, Frdii~k regar&i:~i~. ~hy accessory .apartments were <br /> their zoning, there was a broad <br /> use permit for any use found to be <br /> and the zoning districts specifically <br /> Accessory apartments are not on the <br /> <br />process that eliminated the <br /> <br />She indicated it has been' <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook state6 he d0es not see the difference between renting the apartment and <br />renting a house, There .has beefi,Ta rental property next to him, and the first people that purchas, ed <br />it and lived there, were foUr:~C°ung, men going to college. The renters that are there now do a <br />much better job with the prOperty than the people that owned it and lived there in the first place. <br />If they are not going to allow this they are saying they do not want rental properties anywhere in <br />the City. <br /> <br />~onncilmember Pearson asked what the length will be on the lease· <br /> <br />City Council/October 12, 2004 <br /> Page 12 of 29 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.