Laserfiche WebLink
Our Mission: To work together to resposihly prow our community, and to provide quality, cost-effective. and efficient government services.. <br />CC Regular Session 7. 6. <br />Meeting Date: 05/23/2017 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #17-05-121 Accepting Quotes and Awarding Contract for Improvement Project #17-11, Ground <br />Penetrating Radar Pavement Evaluations - 2018 & 2019 Reconstruction and Overlay Improvements <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose <br />The purpose of this case is adopt Resolution #17-05-121 accepting quotes and awarding a contract for <br />Improvement Project #17-11, Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Evaluations for 2017 - 2026 CIP Reconstruction <br />and Overlay Improvements <br />Background: <br />On more than one occasion staff has proposed pavement maintenance improvements to existing streets based on <br />pavement section information found in plans or by examining spot locations of the existing pavement section, only <br />to learn at a later date that the pavement section was not constructed per plan, or that the pavement section was not <br />consistent throughout. The proposed design must then be revised, which in turn delays projects and impacts project <br />costs, as well as proposed assessment amounts. <br />This happened most recently in the Rivers Bend development where a mill and overlay project was proposed for <br />2017. After soil borings and pavement corings were completed, it was discovered that the pavement was too thin to <br />effectively mill and overlay so the street had to be rescheduled for a reconstruction in 2018. <br />Staff researched available options for evaluating existing pavement section structures and determined that two <br />primary options exist. Staff have typically used soil borings or pavement corings in the past to verify existing <br />pavement sections at numerous locations along street segments. However, a newer technology has emerged in the <br />form of ground penetrating radar. Of these two methods, the ground penetrating radar is significantly cheaper. <br />Ground penetrating radar has been used primarily to locate items buried underground. However, this technology is <br />now being used to evaluate the existing pavement section design in 1 to 2 foot intervals along the entire street, <br />depending on the speed at which the vehicle the radar unit is attached to is traveling. The radar is strong enough to <br />penetrate the top foot or so of the pavement section, revealing changes in material densities between the bituminous <br />or concrete pavement section, the aggregate base section, and subgrade soils. A minimal number of pavement cores <br />are also extracted to calibrate the readings and to verify the specific pavement and aggregate base materials, as well <br />as the subgrade soils. <br />The City has never used ground penetrating radar to evaluate existing pavement sections, whereas soil borings and <br />pavement corings have been used extensively for this purpose. However, staff has found that existing pavement <br />sections on older City streets can vary significantly from location to location. Staff therefore proposes to use ground <br />penetrating radar to evaluate existing pavement sections on all streets proposed to be reconstructed or milled and <br />