Laserfiche WebLink
Assistant Community Development Director replied notice has been received from the adjace t <br />property owner Dennis Sharp that they would be willing to work with the City and the ' ent <br />property owner. If the Council is inclined he would suggest a motion to approve ngent on <br />the City Staff Review Letter dated September 10, 2004, revised October 8, revising the <br />grading and drainage plan to be in compliance with City standards contingent on the <br />drainage and utility easement being worked out by the property o s concerning the pond on <br />the adjacent property prior to issuance of a Certificate of Oce . cy. <br />Ntotr cried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councllmernbers Pearson, ETvig'Cook, Kurak, <br />mmen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br />Case #5: Request for Site Plan Review for CNP Storage- T,ASIe of TSM Development, <br />INC _.. . <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated this ease is rel`atedd to Case NQ 6 and she will be discussing <br />the cases together. She explained TSNXbe elopnient, Inc has submitted a site plan to develop a <br />mini -storage facility on 4.8 acres,on OiAlot A 9fRegency Pond. A major subdivision is being <br />processed along with the site An 16replat Ot 1botA. The Planning Commission reviewed the <br />site plan at their July 1 S` and: Jul 12`h 2004 me'ettngs" al4ong with a subdivision request to replat <br />Outlot A of Regency Pond'.' Shp!bkplained TSM`Devel`npment, Inc. is proposing to construct a <br />19,440-, 15,200-, 10,200-, rand 4S6r00-square foot storage building on Outlot A of Regency <br />ent ilocated in the E-1 Employment District; mini -storage <br />Pond. The proposed develop - <br />facilities. are a.permitted use in this'dts <br />Associate Planner Ge sler ativi-sed the lot ov erage has been calculated at nine percent, which is <br />under the 45 percent maximum 'Yot coverage restriction established in City Code. Under City <br />Code. the proposed developmerit-ust establish a 60-foot buffer yard, with increased plantings, <br />al'ong all residentially zoned properties, the site plan is showing an adequate buffer yard on the <br />eastern. border but not on its norti2ern border. She indicated the most current landscaping plan is <br />still significantly'deficient in, texiris of shrubs, most notably in both the buffer yards to the north <br />and east. At the July 1" ; meeting the Planning Commission recommended a privacy fence <br />between the proposed development and the residential properties to the south, east, and north. <br />The site plan currently shows an 8-foot chain link fence. The proposed site plan received its <br />WMO permit approval on September 16, 2004. WMO approval contained several conditions, <br />including the addition of additional `dead storage' on the Subject Property, and verification that <br />the lowest floor elevations of adjacent homes in Regency Pond are two feet above the 100-year <br />peak flood elevation. Revised grading and drainage plans and calculations were submitted on <br />City Council/October 12, 2004 <br />Page 16 of 29 <br />