11/07/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

That there are other possible locations for the accessory structure on the Subject Property (that may or may not require other fixtures, su_ch as a loose stone patio and/or a small tree, to be moved). 10. That the request is not a use variance. · 11. That the request is not a result ot~ nonconforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 12. That, if granted, the variance will/will not impa/r an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. 13. That, if granted, the variance will/will not increase the congestion in the public street. 14. That, if granted, the variance will/will not adversely impact the degree of public health, safety and general welfare provided for in the Ramsey City Code. 15. That, if granted, the variance will/will not diminish established property values within the neighborhood. 16. That, if granted, the variance will/will not violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. 17. That an undo hardship will/will not result if the variance is denied. 18. That the unique circumstances on the Subject Property, namely the narrowness of the lot, do/do not result from the actions of the Applicants. 19. That the literal interpretation of the side yard setback requirement for comer lots would/would not deprive the Applicants of rights commonly enjoyed by 6ther properties in the same district. 20. That, if granted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicants any special privilege that is denied to the owners of other land in the same district. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: , and and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: and the following were absent: 4O RESOLUTION #02-II- Page 2 of'3