Laserfiche WebLink
An additional review of Level of Service (LOS) was completed for the existing, <br />2040 No -Build, and 2040 Build scenarios. Table 3 and Table 4, below, show <br />the resulting intersection and worst movement LOS results. <br />Table 3 — Existing Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS)1 <br />Inter <br />•n <br />AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour <br />Alpine Drive/Puma Street <br />Bunker Lake Boulevard/Puma Street <br />Alpine Drive/Site Access <br />Puma Street/ Northern Site Access <br />Puma Street/Southern Site Access <br />Alpine Drive/TH 10 <br />A (a) <br />A (a) <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />A (f) <br />A (a) <br />A (a) <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />A (f) <br />1 The number is the intersection delay. The first letter is the Level of Service for the <br />intersection. The second letter (in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst <br />operating movement. <br />As Table 3 shows, all intersections operate at an overall intersection LOS A <br />with worst movements at LOS A, with the exception of the southwest bound left <br />from Alpine Drive onto TH 10. This movement operates at a LOS F, however, <br />with a queue of less than two vehicles there is little concern of this movement. <br />Table 4 — 2040 Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS)1 <br />041 A 140 'y <br />Intersection No -Build No-: <br />,41 AM 041 PM <br />Build Build <br />Alpine Drive/Puma Street <br />Bunker Lake Boulevard/Puma Street <br />Alpine Drive/Site Access <br />Puma Street/ Northern Site Access <br />Puma Street/Southern Site Access <br />Alpine Drive/TH 10 <br />A (c) <br />A (b) <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />B (f) <br />A (b) <br />A (b) <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />F (f) <br />A (c) <br />A (b) <br />A (b) <br />A (b) <br />A (c) <br />B (f) <br />A (c) <br />A (b) <br />A (b) <br />A (c) <br />A (c) <br />F (f) <br />1 The number is the intersection delay. The first letter is the Level of Service for the <br />intersection. The second letter (in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst <br />operating movement. <br />It should be noted that due to the high mainline volumes along TH 10 the HCM <br />calculations begin to break down and the results do not accurately represent <br />the expected conditions (specifically noted in the PM scenarios highlighted in <br />red). However, even with that in mind, the TH 10/Alpine Drive intersection does <br />begin to experience excessive delays that should be addressed. <br />b. Vehicular Mitigation Analysis <br />The above analyses indicate all study intersections are forecast to operate <br />acceptably, with the exception of TH 10/Alpine Drive, under all scenarios, <br />including with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed addition of the <br />Capstone Homes Development. As Charts 1 and Chart 2 show, the existing, no - <br />build, and build queues stay consistent and well below the standard thresholds. <br />Traffic Impact Study 8 <br />Capstone Homes Residential Development <br />NSULTUNG <br />