Agenda - Council - 09/12/2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

DATE PROJECT. TITLE ESCROW # DEPARTMENT: TECHNICAL REVIEWER: CITY OF RAMSEY LAND USE APPLICATION TECHNICAL REVIEW FILE 9/7/2017 PROJECT ADDRESS SE CORNER OF 143'D AND JASPAR 17-127: BUNKER LAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION FINAL PLAT Community Development: Planning Division (Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code) Name: Eric Zweber, Planning Consultant Phone: (763)762-2837 Email: EZwebernwsbene.com Comments Requiring Plan Revisions: Comments regarding Public Road Improvement plans 1. (Sheet G0.01) Modify the Public Road Improvements Title Sheet to include Sheets C4.03 thru C4.05. 2. (Sheet C2.05) The north side of the ditch located west of Jackel St NW does not seem to connect with the existing grades which may require grading within the Bunker Lake Blvd. Please revise accordingly. 3. (Sheet C2.05) What is the purpose of the gravel access drive? Is it a construction entrance? If it is semi- permanent, a culvert should be installed at the ditch. 4. (Sheet C4.04) A condition of approval will be that the private drive (and any necessary development agreement) will be required to be constructed with any improvement/Site Plan approval of Lot 1. 5. (Sheet C7.02) No parking sign should be extended around the cul-de-sac. Comments regarding the Bunker Lake Industrial Park Addition Final Plat 1. Drainage and Utility Easement over all of Outlot C. Comment regarding Lot 1 Site Improvements plans 1. (C2.04) If not completed previously, a condition of approval would include the construction of the Lot 2 stormwater improvements with the Lot 1 stormwater improvements. 2. (C2.04) The sidewalk northwest of the building leading to the trash enclosure does not seem to match the grades of the ramp to the east of the sidewalk. Is the sidewalk slope at a 6.9% grade like the ramp or is there a retaining wall separating the two? 3. (C2.06) The access drive on the east side of the building is only 20 feet wide, which does not meet the requirement for a two-way access drive. Is this proposed to be a one-way street? 4. (C3.01) The curb at the northwest corner of the western ramp lists to top of wall elevations, but there is other top of wall measurements. How extensive (i.e. how long) is this retaining wall? 5. (C4.01) The location of CO 2 does not match the location of the roof drain riser on architectural Sheet A3. Please revise accordingly. Comments regarding Building #2 plans 1. Consider changing the name of this building to Building #1 to match that it is located on Lot #1 to avoid confusion. 2. (Sheet A2) What is the "sanitary line for future develop" running east to west on the southern side of the building? It isn't connected to the mechanical room and is not shown on the utility plan.