Laserfiche WebLink
That the Applicant has provided a site plan that identifies a parking lot depth of <br />approximately sixty-one (61) feet between the front of the office building and the existing <br />chain link fence along the front property line. <br /> <br />10. That the Applicant has stated that combination of the location of the sales office and the <br /> requirement for a 20 foot setback from front property line results in a vehicle sales and <br /> custolner parking area with a depth of 40 feet, which is not sufficient as there also needs to be <br /> a drive aisle between the customer parking area next to the building and the vehicles <br /> displayed in the front yard. <br /> <br />11. That the Applicant has stated the variance requested is the minimum variance needed to <br /> alleviate the hardship. <br /> <br />12. That if granted, the variance will not permit a use that is prohibited in the B-2 Highway <br /> Business District. <br /> <br />13. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br /> property. <br /> <br />14. That if granted, the variance will not endanger the public safety. <br /> <br />15. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably diminish property values in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> <br />16. That if granted, the variance will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />17. That, if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicants any special privileges that are <br /> denied to other owners of land in the same district. <br /> <br />18. That undue hardship will not result if the variance request is denied due to the existence of <br /> special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land and which are not <br /> applicable to other lands in the same district. <br /> <br />19. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner <br />Jeffrey, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Johnson <br />Board Member Brauer <br />Board Member Jeffrey <br />Board Member Shepherd <br />Board Member Watson <br /> <br />RESOLUTION/404-10-304 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />