Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/02/1992

Home

Background: CASE REVIEW PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik Per the Commi$sion's direction at their February meeting, I have made additional amendments to the propoS.e~l~ sign ordinance. The following is a listing of and a reference to those amendments: 1. Pro?ide!a definition for banners separate from pennants. Make allowances for banners to be used fas wall signs year around. AcCOmplished. For definition, see Section 9.12.02. For regulations, see Subd. 10 of Se~,tioni9.12.03. Section 9.12.05, subd. 1, was also modified accordingly to eliminate refbrenqe to banners. 2. Establis~ regulations for flags and restrict use of flags for commercial purposes. Ac¢°m~lished. Refer to Subd. 11 of Section 9.12.03. 3. Do,not ~mit temporary real estate signs for the purpose of selling or leasing individual lots or buildings to on-site only. AccOmPlished. Refer to Section 9.12.05, Subd. 5. Item b.3 limiting these types of signs to One p~r street frontage was eliminated. 4. Provide language to allow the use of pennants as long as they are well maintained. AcO0mlJ~Iished. Refer to Section 9.12.03, Subdivision 9. Section 9.12.05, subd. 1, was als0 mo{lifted accordingly to eliminate reference to pennants. Section 9.12.17, subd. 3, was ~als~ modified to exempt pennants from permits and fees. Recommendation: There have beeh a substantial number of changes made to the proposed sign ordinance since the pubhc hea~i~g. ~I would recommend that ~f there are no further amendments, that the Planning and Zoning COmmission conduct one additional public hearing prior to sending the ordinance to Council fo~ adoption. Commission Action: Motion tO: Schedul.~ a public hearing for p.m., on , , 1992 regarding the proposed sign ordinance. Review CheckliSt: Zoning Administrator P&Z: 3/2/92