Laserfiche WebLink
patterns, and it would be much more preferable to complete the trail between the west terminus <br />of the existing trail on the north side of Alpine Drive and CSAH 5. Although this section is <br />relatively short it will require installing curb and gutter on Alpine Drive and may involve <br />property acquisition as well. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated he had a difficult time with the recommendation on these <br />requests. He explained on one'hand, to put al crOsswalk in from a monetary standpoint is <br />relatively inexpensive, at only about $1,000. iHoWcver, on the other hand, they want to avoid the <br />proliferation of crosswalks and use them sparingly. His initial inclination was to deny the <br />requests and wait for a more permanent solutioni but he realizes it may be difficult to get this <br />piece of trail in soon. As an alternate recommendation the Council may wish to install this <br />crosswalk and specify it be there Only untilSuch time as there is a more permanent crossing that <br />can be obtained on CR 5, and a piece oftraiI extended. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec commented there Could be a crOssing guard at CR 5 and Alpine Drive. He <br />expressed concern with kids cutting though the City Hall property between parked cars, with the <br />police cars coming out of there fast. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook suggested the crosswalk could be laid out with reflective tape. He stated <br />he agrees with the mayor, and he would agree with a temporary crosswalk. However, a <br />crosswalk does not work as well in the middle of a walk as at an intersection, and they should <br />move aggressively on the trail next summer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen indicated they shoUld do something temporarily, but should move <br />forward as quickly as they can on completing that trail section. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Strommen, to approve the <br />crosswalk as a temporary installation at Such time as the trail system is completed on the north <br />side on Alpine Drive west to CSAH 5. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Strommen, Elvig, Kurak, <br />and Pearson. Voting No: None. Absent: CouncilmemberZimmerrnan. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Request for Preliminary Plat ReView of Regency Pond 4th Addition; Case of <br />TSM Developmenti Inc. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated TSM Development has submitted a request for preliminary <br />plat review of Regency Pond 4th Addition. Based on the direction received at the October 19th <br />work session, staff worked with the applicant on; an appropriate cul-de-sac for the terminus of <br />148~' Avenue NW, which is shown on the revised preliminary plat. At the August 5, 2004 <br />meeting the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for preliminary plat <br />approval, with several conditions. The revised .preliminary plat meets these conditions, along <br />with those raised at the October 12, 2004 Council meeting. Staff is recommending approval of <br />the preliminary plat. <br /> <br />City Council/November 9, 2004 <br /> Page 16 0f31 <br /> <br /> <br />