My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 10/12/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council - 10/12/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:54:41 PM
Creation date
11/30/2004 11:40:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
peak flood elevation. Revised grading and drainage plans and calculations were submitted on <br />October 6, 2004; the WMO engineer will need to review these revised plans to ensure they <br />comply with WMO permit approval. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated Outlot A of Regency Pond is proposed to be replatted as Lot <br />l, Block 1 and Outlot A, Regency Pond 4th Addition. The lot exceeds the one-acre mininmm lot <br />size requirement and the 200-foot lot width requirement. The grading, drainage, and utility plans <br />are being reviewed as part of the CNP Storage site plan. All drainage ponds shown on the site <br />must be dedicated as drainage and utility easements on the final plat. Engineering staff is also <br />recommending a full cul-de-sac be provided for 148th Avenue, which is regularly required for <br />stub strcets in new developments throughout the City. The plat is proposing to gain access <br />through a private access off of Ramsey Boulevard. Staff has received written comments from <br />Anoka County that indicate this access is acceptable. One of the conditions of Anoka County's <br />approval is that the comer property also utilizes this access, should it redevelop in the future. <br />The preliminary plat shows an outlot at this location; an additional legal agreement will need to <br />be drafted to guarantee access to this comer property. <br /> <br />Associae Planner Geisler advised the Planning Commission recommended approval of the <br />proposed site plan contingent on approval of the subdivision request, and that the request for <br />preliminary plat be approved with the following conditions: <br /> · Approval of the request for site plan review of CNP Storage <br /> · Access to line up with 147th Avenue in Town Center Gardens on the west side of Ramsey <br /> Boulevard <br /> · The minimum cul-de-sac length necessary as determined by staff as the terminus of 148th <br /> Avenue <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated staff recommends denial of the site plan until the <br />deficiencies are resolved. Given the lack of a full cul-de-sac on 148th Avenue, combined with <br />grading, drainage, and landscaping deficiencies associated with the site plan, staff is <br />recommending that the request for preliminary plat approval be denied. <br /> <br />Steve Schmidt, 222 Monroe Street in Anoka, of TSM Development, stated when Regency Ponds <br />was platted, Oakwood Development had purchased all the land from Wayne Johi~son and he <br />acquired this land from him. He was here seven years ago proposing townhomes, which the <br />neighbo,'s did not want. The City changed the zoning and this current use complies. Originally <br />148t~' Avenue was to go through to Ramsey Boulevard, now with the layout from the access and <br />Town Center, the county does not like that proximity. When this was reviewed with the <br />Planning Commission it was clear that the county would not allow that access. He talked to two <br />county commissioners and the proposed access has been agreed to. He said he would create an <br />ontlot that could be acquired so there would be access for the adjacent property when it is <br />developed. He stated the Planning Commission felt this plat could be worked out with a minor <br />cul-de-sac, and he is now being told he has to give a full cul-de-sac. This would take away a <br />minimum of 18 units from him. He stated when this was discussed the code allowed a chain link <br />fence. Ifc agreed he would be willing to put up a privacy fence, but he does not see a need for <br />the privacy fence as well as a buffer of shrubs inside the fence. He stated if there was going to be <br /> <br />City Council/October 12, 2004 <br /> Page 17 of 30 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.